APS Logo

Realizing three logical qubits in a qLDPC code with superconducting circuits, Part 1: Theory

ORAL

Abstract

Recent work has shown that quantum error correcting codes with non-local connectivity may significantly reduce the qubit overhead required to reach algorithmically relevant logical error rates [1]. However, realizing these so-called quantum low-density parity-check (qLDPC) codes with superconducting qubits seems challenging since this platform most naturally supports 2D local connectivities. In this two-part talk, we outline our theoretical and experimental efforts toward realizing a small-scale qLDPC code using superconducting qubits, encoding three logical qubits at distance-two with only six data qubits and two long-range connections. The results presented in this talk, combined with discussions on how our techniques extend to larger code architectures, provide evidence for a path to low-overhead quantum error correction with superconducting qubits.

Part 1 will theoretically introduce our novel [[6,3,2]] code, featuring X, Z, and Y stabilizers, which are measured repeatedly. We discuss the implications of operating on three logical qubits within one code block and present schemes such as logical cluster-state preparation and logical teleportation between our three logical qubits.



[1] S. Bravyi, et al., Nature, 2024

Presenters

  • Lukas Pahl

    Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Authors

  • Lukas Pahl

    Massachusetts Institute of Technology

  • David Pahl

    Massachusetts Institute of Technology

  • Max Hays

    MIT, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Massachusetts Institute of Technology

  • Daniel Miller

    Freie Universität Berlin

  • William P Banner

    Massachusetts Institute of Technology

  • Gabriel Cutter

    Massachusetts Institute of Technology

  • Vaishnavi Addala

    Massachusetts Institute of Technology

  • Michael Gingras

    MIT Lincoln Laboratory

  • Jeffrey M Knecht

    MIT Lincoln Laboratory

  • Bethany M Niedzielski

    MIT Lincoln Laboratory

  • Hannah M Stickler

    MIT Lincoln Laboratory

  • Mollie E Schwartz

    MIT Lincoln Laboratory, Lincoln Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology

  • Kyle Serniak

    MIT Lincoln Laboratory, Lincoln Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology

  • Jeffrey A Grover

    Massachusetts Institute of Technology

  • Jens Eisert

    Freie Universität Berlin, FU Berlin

  • William D Oliver

    Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT)