APS Logo

Observation of efective supespin relaxation times that do not follow the Rosensweig behavior in interacting magnetic nanoparticle ensembles immersed in carrier fluids.

ORAL

Abstract

We used ac-susceptibility measurements to study the superspin relaxation in Fe3O4 / Isopar M nanomagnetic fluids of different concentrations. Temperature-resolved data collected at different frequencies, c¢¢ vs. T|f, reveal magnetic events both below and above the freezing point of the carrier fluid (TF=197K): c¢¢ shows peaks at temperatures Tp1 and Tp2 around 75 K and 225 K, respectively. Below TF, the Néel mechanism is entirely responsible for the superspin relaxation (as the carrier fluid is frozen), and we found that the temperature dependence of the relaxation time, tN(Tp1), is well described by the Dorman-Bessais-Fiorani (DBF) model: . Above TF, both the internal (Néel) and the Brownian superspin relaxation mechanisms are active. Yet, we found evidence that the effective relaxation times, teff, corresponding to the Tp2 peaks observed in the denser samples do not follow the typical Debye behavior described by the Rosensweig formula . First, teff is 5×10-5 s at 225 K, almost three orders of magnitude more that its Néel counterpart, tN~ 8×10-8 s, estimated by extrapolating the above-mentioned DBF analysis. Thus, , which is clearly not consistent with the Rosensweig formula. Second, the observed temperature dependence of the effective relaxation time, teff(Tp2), is excellently described by , a model solely based on the hydrodynamic Brown relaxation, , combined with an activation law for the temperature variation of the viscosity, . The best fit yields =1.6×10-5 s·K, E¢/kB=312 K, and T0¢=178 K. Finally, the higher temperature Tp2 peaks vanish in the more diluted samples (d£0.02). This indicates that the formation of larger hydrodynamic particles via aggregation, which is responsible for the observed Brownian relaxation in dense samples, is inhibited by dilution. Our findings, corroborated with previous results from Monte Carlo calculations are important because they might lead to new strategies to synthesize functional magnetic ferrofluids for biomedical applications.

Publication: Materials 2024, 17, 3957. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17163957

Presenters

  • Cristian Botez

    University of Texas at San Antonio

Authors

  • Cristian Botez

    University of Texas at San Antonio