Theoretical and computational overview of high T<sub>c</sub> superconductivity in nickelates
ORAL · Invited
Abstract
The discovery of superconductivity in the infinite layer nickelates started a novel field within unconventional superconductivity, providing also the opportunity to understand the differences and similarities with the cuprates [1]. In addition, the recent observation of pressure-induced superconductivity at 80K in the bilayer La3Ni2O7 (LNO), as well as in the trilayer La4Ni3O10, different from the previously studied infinite layer nickelates, has unveiled a vast and exciting window into high-Tc superconductivity where now the Ni orbital degrees of freedom play a key role.
We investigated theoretically the whole family of bilayer 327-type nickelates R3Ni2O7 (R = rare-earth elements from La to Lu) [2,3,5,6,9], as well as the non-superconducting bilayer La3Ni2O6 [4], and the trilayer La4Ni3O10 [7], all under pressure, and we also studied the hybrid stacking nickelate superlattice La7Ni5O17 [8]. Initial studies using density functional theory (DFT) allowed to identify a structural phase transition that occurs under pressure [2] and the relevance of two active orbitals, d3z2−r2 and dx2−y2, near the Fermi energy, instead of just one active orbital as in the cuprates. This allowed us to construct a two-orbital model Hamiltonian with Hubbard and Hund interactions, and crystal field, whose parameters and geometry were adapted to each of the investigated materials [2-9] and studied using primarily the random phase approximation (RPA) to incorporate electronic correlations. Some results were also obtained with the density matrix renormalization group (DMRG)[9]. Our primary RPA result is that the s±-wave pairing tendency, similar to that of Fe-based superconductors, dominates the multilayer structures, due to the nesting between the M = (π,π) and the X = (π , 0) and Y = (0, π) points in the Brillouin zone [4]. The nesting is associated to magnetic tendencies that were observed in our calculations and indeed the lack of nesting and pockets around M = (π,π) in La3Ni2O6 may explain the absence of superconductivity in this material [3]. Results on the magnetic effects of doping will be discussed as well [9].
We investigated theoretically the whole family of bilayer 327-type nickelates R3Ni2O7 (R = rare-earth elements from La to Lu) [2,3,5,6,9], as well as the non-superconducting bilayer La3Ni2O6 [4], and the trilayer La4Ni3O10 [7], all under pressure, and we also studied the hybrid stacking nickelate superlattice La7Ni5O17 [8]. Initial studies using density functional theory (DFT) allowed to identify a structural phase transition that occurs under pressure [2] and the relevance of two active orbitals, d3z2−r2 and dx2−y2, near the Fermi energy, instead of just one active orbital as in the cuprates. This allowed us to construct a two-orbital model Hamiltonian with Hubbard and Hund interactions, and crystal field, whose parameters and geometry were adapted to each of the investigated materials [2-9] and studied using primarily the random phase approximation (RPA) to incorporate electronic correlations. Some results were also obtained with the density matrix renormalization group (DMRG)[9]. Our primary RPA result is that the s±-wave pairing tendency, similar to that of Fe-based superconductors, dominates the multilayer structures, due to the nesting between the M = (π,π) and the X = (π , 0) and Y = (0, π) points in the Brillouin zone [4]. The nesting is associated to magnetic tendencies that were observed in our calculations and indeed the lack of nesting and pockets around M = (π,π) in La3Ni2O6 may explain the absence of superconductivity in this material [3]. Results on the magnetic effects of doping will be discussed as well [9].
–
Publication: [1] Y. Zhang et al., PRB 102, 195117 (2020).<br>[2] Y. Zhang et al., PRB 108, 165141 (2023).<br>[3] Y. Zhang et al., PRB 108, L180510 (2023).<br>[4] Y. Zhang et al., PRB 109, 045151 (2024).<br>[5] Y. Zhang et al., Nat. Comm. 15, 2470 (2024).<br>[6] Y. Zhang et al., PRB 110, L060510 (2024).<br>[7] Y. Zhang et al., PRL 133, 136001 (2024).<br>[8] Y. Zhang et al., arXiv: 2408.07690.<br>[9] Y. Zhang et al., arXiv: 2408.05689.
Presenters
-
Adriana Moreo
University of Tennessee
Authors
-
Adriana Moreo
University of Tennessee
-
Yang Zhang
University of Tennessee
-
Ling-Fang Lin
University of Tennessee
-
Thomas A Maier
Oak Ridge National Laboratory
-
Elbio R Dagotto
University of Tennessee