A critical discourse analysis of research on Physics Identity

Physics Identity is a theoretical framework which was designed to pinpoint the reasons for a lack of recruitment and retention of women in physics. Since then, it has been used quantitatively and qualitatively to study many different populations of students, often as a proxy measure for student recruitment and retention. This talk lays out a Habersmanian critical discourse analysis (CDA) of physics identity research, which goes beyond a systematic literature review by examining the implicit assumptions commonly found within the literature. This method combats academic hegemony by examining the diversity of methods and study populations, as well as engaging with how well the academic discourses align with real-world experiences. More specifically, this talk explores how Physics Identity research goals align with what is being studied, exactly what “having more Physics Identity” means, and how this relates to diversity, equity, and inclusion goals in physics.