What rejuvenation and memory tell us about non-equilibrium spin glass dynamics
ORAL · Invited
Abstract
The spin glass problem is interesting because of its unique dynamical properties [1], the most famous of these being aging, rejuvenation, and memory. Aging is a relaxation of the susceptibility at fixed temperature [2]. Rejuvenation occurs when the sample is cooled after an aging process and returns to a reference cooling curve taken without any aging procedures – seemingly “forgetting” that it aged [2]. In the memory effect, a sample starts from a temperature below the aging temperature and upon warming the sample “remembers” its previous cooling history [2]. In this talk, we discuss our ac susceptibility experiments studying rejuvenation and memory in a single crystal of CuMn with 7.92 at.% Mn (grown by Deborah Schlagel at Ames National Laboratory). To do this, a “double waiting time” experiment is conducted where the sample is first aged at high temperature (T1) for some time (t1). The temperature is then lowered by 4 kelvin (T2) and aged again for a second time (t2). Our results show that the amount of memory retained upon heating back to T1 depends on the aging time at each temperature – the longer t1 is, the more memory is retained, but the longer t2 is, the less memory is retained. While seemingly contradictory, we explain our results using the framework of temperature chaos – or the temperature change required to make the energy landscape unrecognizable [3]. At each waiting temperature, correlated regions develop, but due to temperature chaos, they are independent. Thus, waiting longer at T1 will improve memory, but waiting longer at T2 will reduce it.
[1] Stein, Daniel L., and Charles M. Newman. “Spin glasses and complexity.” Vol. 4. Princeton University Press (2013).
[2] Jonason, K., et al. "Memory and chaos effects in spin glasses." Physical Review Letters 81.15 (1998): 3243.
[3] Bray, Alan J., and Michael A. Moore. "Chaotic nature of the spin-glass phase." Physical review letters 58.1 (1987): 57.
[1] Stein, Daniel L., and Charles M. Newman. “Spin glasses and complexity.” Vol. 4. Princeton University Press (2013).
[2] Jonason, K., et al. "Memory and chaos effects in spin glasses." Physical Review Letters 81.15 (1998): 3243.
[3] Bray, Alan J., and Michael A. Moore. "Chaotic nature of the spin-glass phase." Physical review letters 58.1 (1987): 57.
–
Presenters
-
Jennifer Freedberg
University of Minnesota
Authors
-
Jennifer Freedberg
University of Minnesota
-
Raymond Orbach
University of Texas, Austin, University of Texas at Austin
-
E. Dan Dahlberg
University of Minnesota