Transition signatures in the magnetothermal conductivity of α-RuCl<sub>3</sub>
ORAL
Abstract
We report measurements of the thermal conductivity κxx in the Kitaev spin liquid candidate α-RuCl3, performed on high-quality single crystals as a function of magnetic field B applied within the plane, for directions B || a and B || b, at temperatures down to 0.1 K.
We observe oscillations in κxx vs B that are characterized by four minima – located at B1, B2, B3 and B4. The first two minima, at B1 ≈ 6 T and B2 ≈ 7.5 T are clearly associated with the end of the antiferromagnetic phase at Bc2 ≈ 7.5 T (and its internal transition at Bc1 ≈ 6 T).
The upper two minima have been attributed to quantum oscillations associated with fermionic excitations (spinons) in a putative quantum spin liquid state, which would end at a threshold field B* ~ 12 T (for B || a) [1], above which κxx(B) is featureless, free of oscillations and constant with field.
In agreement with others [2], we instead attribute the upper minima at B3 and B4 to secondary magnetic transitions, given that we find their anisotropy (B || a vs B || b) to track the anisotropy of the transition field B*.
[1] Czajka et al., Nat. Phys. 17, 915 (2021).
[2] Bruin et al., APL Mat. 10, 090703 (2022).
We observe oscillations in κxx vs B that are characterized by four minima – located at B1, B2, B3 and B4. The first two minima, at B1 ≈ 6 T and B2 ≈ 7.5 T are clearly associated with the end of the antiferromagnetic phase at Bc2 ≈ 7.5 T (and its internal transition at Bc1 ≈ 6 T).
The upper two minima have been attributed to quantum oscillations associated with fermionic excitations (spinons) in a putative quantum spin liquid state, which would end at a threshold field B* ~ 12 T (for B || a) [1], above which κxx(B) is featureless, free of oscillations and constant with field.
In agreement with others [2], we instead attribute the upper minima at B3 and B4 to secondary magnetic transitions, given that we find their anisotropy (B || a vs B || b) to track the anisotropy of the transition field B*.
[1] Czajka et al., Nat. Phys. 17, 915 (2021).
[2] Bruin et al., APL Mat. 10, 090703 (2022).
–
Presenters
-
Etienne Lefrancois
Universite de Sherbrooke, Université de Sherbrooke
Authors
-
Etienne Lefrancois
Universite de Sherbrooke, Université de Sherbrooke