Low-temperature thermal conductivity of the trilayer cuprate Hg1223
ORAL
Abstract
The sustained intensity of interest in the high-Tc cuprate superconductors owes much to the rich phenomenology displayed across their phase diagrams; this diversity of phenomena in close proximity is nowhere more apparent than in the multilayer cuprate materials, where the charge imbalance between CuO2 plane layers has been recently shown to allow the coexistence of competing orders within the same unit cell, hosted by different layers [1-3]: a striking example is the trilayer cuprate Hg1223 (HgBa2Ca2Cu3O8+δ), for which recent quantum oscillation measurements on samples with p ≈ 8% suggest antiferromagnetic order in the inner plane, surrounded by charge order in the outer planes [3].
The influence of these orders on the coexisting superconductivity remains an important issue, and low-temperature thermal conductivity measurements can be a powerful probe of the relevant low-energy quasiparticles deep in the superconducting state. To this end, we will present new dilution-fridge-temperature thermal conductivity measurements as a function of magnetic field on underdoped Hg1223 (for Tc = 78 K and 112 K) as well as the related single-layer cuprate Hg1201 (HgBa2CuO6+δ, for Tc = 74 K), along with comparison to other cuprates.
[1] Ideta et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 227001 (2010).
[2] Mukuda et al., J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 81, 011008 (2012).
[3] Oliviero et al., Nat. Commun. 13, 1568 (2022).
The influence of these orders on the coexisting superconductivity remains an important issue, and low-temperature thermal conductivity measurements can be a powerful probe of the relevant low-energy quasiparticles deep in the superconducting state. To this end, we will present new dilution-fridge-temperature thermal conductivity measurements as a function of magnetic field on underdoped Hg1223 (for Tc = 78 K and 112 K) as well as the related single-layer cuprate Hg1201 (HgBa2CuO6+δ, for Tc = 74 K), along with comparison to other cuprates.
[1] Ideta et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 227001 (2010).
[2] Mukuda et al., J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 81, 011008 (2012).
[3] Oliviero et al., Nat. Commun. 13, 1568 (2022).
–
Presenters
-
Jordan Baglo
Université de Sherbrooke
Authors
-
Jordan Baglo
Université de Sherbrooke
-
Munkhtuguldur Altangerel
Université de Sherbrooke
-
Etienne Lefrancois
Universite de Sherbrooke, Université de Sherbrooke
-
Quentin Barthélemy
Universite de Sherbrooke, Université de Sherbrooke
-
Anne Forget
CEA Saclay, CEA Saclay, Paris, France
-
Dorothée Colson
CEA Saclay, CEA Saclay, Paris, France
-
Cyril Proust
Laboratoire National des Champs Magnétiques Intenses
-
Louis Taillefer
Universite de Sherbrooke, Université de Sherbrooke