A Real Space Approach to Uniqueness in Polarization
ORAL
Abstract
A fundamental issue in the atomic and quantum scale modeling of dielectric materials is the question of
defining the macroscopic polarization. In a periodic crystal, the usual definition of the polarization as the
dipole of the charge in a unit cell depends on the choice of the unit cell.
We examine this issue using a rigorous approach based on the framework of two-scale convergence.
Starting with a periodic charge density on a compact domain, we examine the continuum limit of lattice
spacing going to zero. We prove that accounting for the boundaries consistently, provides a route to
uniquely compute electric fields and potentials, despite the non-unique polarization.
Specifically, there are partial unit cells at the boundary which, not being charge neutral, give rise to a
surface charge. Different choices of the unit cell in the interior of the body leads to different partial unit
cells at the boundary; the net effect is that these changes compensate each other.
We also explain how the aforementioned polarization is connected to the “Free Energy Density” and the
“Modern Theory of Polarization”/“Berry Phase” definitions of polarization. We show that using both
these definitions, the potentials and bound charges are the same.
defining the macroscopic polarization. In a periodic crystal, the usual definition of the polarization as the
dipole of the charge in a unit cell depends on the choice of the unit cell.
We examine this issue using a rigorous approach based on the framework of two-scale convergence.
Starting with a periodic charge density on a compact domain, we examine the continuum limit of lattice
spacing going to zero. We prove that accounting for the boundaries consistently, provides a route to
uniquely compute electric fields and potentials, despite the non-unique polarization.
Specifically, there are partial unit cells at the boundary which, not being charge neutral, give rise to a
surface charge. Different choices of the unit cell in the interior of the body leads to different partial unit
cells at the boundary; the net effect is that these changes compensate each other.
We also explain how the aforementioned polarization is connected to the “Free Energy Density” and the
“Modern Theory of Polarization”/“Berry Phase” definitions of polarization. We show that using both
these definitions, the potentials and bound charges are the same.
–
Presenters
-
SHOHAM SEN
University of Minnesota
Authors
-
SHOHAM SEN
University of Minnesota
-
Kaushik Dayal
Carnegie Mellon University