APS Logo

Interactive Test for Classically-Verifiable Quantum Advantage

ORAL

Abstract



An interactive test of quantum advantage is a protocol in which a verifier issues challenges constructed from cryptographic functions to a prover, so as to verify whether the prover’s computational capability is beyond the classical limit. Since the prover’s responses to these challenges can be efficiently tested by the verifier with only classical computation, these protocols provide a scalable approach for the demonstration of quantum advantage.

We present the first implementation of an interactive test of quantum advantage on an ion-trap quantum computer; we execute two complementary protocols---one where the cryptographic construction implements a modified Bell test and another based on the learning with errors problem. To perform multiple rounds of interaction, we use a split-and-shuttle approach to realize mid-circuit measurements on a subsystem, with subsequent coherent evolution. For both protocols, the fidelities exceed the asymptotic bound for classical behavior; maintaining this fidelity at scale would conclusively demonstrate verifiable quantum advantage.

Presenters

  • Daiwei Zhu

    IonQ

Authors

  • Daiwei Zhu

    IonQ

  • Greg Meyer

    University of California, Berkeley

  • Laura Lewis

    California Institute of Technology

  • Crystal Noel

    JQI and QuICS and Department of Physics, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742; Duke Quantum Center and Department of Physics (and ECE), Duke University, Durham NC, Duke, Duke University

  • Or Katz

    Duke University

  • Bahaa Harraz

    University of Maryland

  • Qingfeng Wang

    University of Maryland, College Park, University of Maryland

  • Andrew Risinger

    University of Maryland

  • Lei O Feng

    JQI and QuICS and Department of Physics, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742; Duke Quantum Center and Department of Physics (and ECE), Duke University; IonQ, Duke University

  • Debopriyo Biswas

    Duke University

  • Laird Egan

    IonQ

  • Alexandru Gheorghiu

    ETH Zürich

  • Yunseong Nam

    University of Maryland

  • Thomas Vidick

    California Institute of Technology

  • Umesh Vazirani

    University of California, Berkeley

  • Norman Y Yao

    University of California, Berkeley

  • Marko Cetina

    Duke University

  • Christopher Monroe

    Duke University