APS Logo

Intercalated Kitaev magnets in the clean and disordered limits

Invited

Abstract

In recent years, a new class of intercalated Kitaev materials has emerged from the substitution of interlayer Li and Na atoms in Li2IrO3 and Na2IrO3 with Cu, Ag, and H. Examples of such materials include Cu2IrO3, Cu3LiIr2O6, Ag3LiIr2O6, and H3LiIr2O6. Some of the early studies on these materials have shown promising evidence of proximity to a Kitaev spin liquid grounds state with anyonic excitations. For example, the lack of magnetic ordering, a scaling behavior of the specific heat, and a two-step release of magnetic entropy are all consistent with the theoretical prediction of a spin liquid ground state with fractionalized excitations. Here we present a careful overview of the properties of these materials and compare their magnetic behaviors in the clean and disordered limits. Specifically, we scrutinize the role of interlayer coupling in the physics of Kitaev magnets and demonstrate how the stacking faults and bond randomness can impair our understanding of the magnetism in the clean limit. We also show that unlike some of the early reports, magnetic ordering is not always suppressed after Cu or Ag exchange. In fact, the magnetism can be fortified by intercalation in the limit of weak spin-orbit coupling. This presentation will give an honest overview of the recent candidate materials for the Kitaev spin liquid phase and clarifies some of the controversial findings in the field.

Presenters

  • Fazel Tafti

    Boston College, Department of Physics, Boston College, Department of Physics, Boston College, Chestnut Hill, MA 02467, USA

Authors

  • Fazel Tafti

    Boston College, Department of Physics, Boston College, Department of Physics, Boston College, Chestnut Hill, MA 02467, USA

  • Faranak Bahrami

    Department of Physics, Boston College, Boston College

  • Eric Kenney

    Boston College

  • Mykola Abramchuk

    Boston College

  • Michael John Graf

    Physics Department, Boston College, Boston College

  • Daniel Haskel

    Argonne National Laboratory, Advanced Photon Source, Argonne National Laboratory

  • Carlo Segre

    Illinois Institute of Technology

  • Adam Berlie

    Rutherford Appleton Laboratory

  • Chennan Wang

    Paul Scherrer Institute, Laboratory for Muon Spin Spectroscopy, Paul Scherrer Institute