APS Logo

Nonlinear Dynamics of Nonconcatenated Entangled Ring Polymers

Invited

Abstract

The steady-state shear viscosity of nonconcatenated ring polymer melts is studied by a combination of experiments, simulations, and theory. Experiments using polystyrenes with Z≈5 and Z≈11 entanglements indicate weaker shear thinning for rings compared to linear polymers and observe power-law dependence of ring shear viscosity on shear rate with exponent -0.56±0.02 up to Weissenberg number Wi~100. Non-equilibrium molecular dynamics simulations reveal a similar shear thinning behavior with exponent -0.57±0.08 for a wider range of the number of entanglements per ring 4≤Z≤57. If the shear rate exceeds a certain threshold, shear-thinning becomes non-universal, chain length-dependent. In our experiments, we see the onset of this regime at the largest accessed Wi, and in simulations, which we extended up to Wi~10,000, it is fully developed. In this regime, viscosity decreases with increasing chain length. A simple scaling theory predicts universal regime in the sheared melt of rings with viscosity decreasing with the shear rate with exponent -0.57, in good agreement with both experiments and simulations. We develop a shear slit model explaining many subtle details of observed conformations and dynamics as well as the chain length-dependent behavior of viscosity in the non-universal regime at large shear rates. The signature feature of the model is the presence of two distinct length scales: each chain is confined in the velocity gradient direction to a shear slit of thickness dictated by the size of chain section with relaxation time on the order of reciprocal shear rate, while chains are strongly stretched in the flow velocity direction, with much smaller tension blobs. In this model, the chain length-dependent onset of non-universal behavior is set by tension blob getting as small as about one Kuhn segment.

Presenters

  • Michael Rubinstein

    Duke University, Departments of Mechanical Engineering and Materials Science, Biomedical Engineering, Chemistry and Physics, Duke University

Authors

  • Michael Rubinstein

    Duke University, Departments of Mechanical Engineering and Materials Science, Biomedical Engineering, Chemistry and Physics, Duke University

  • Daniele Parisi

    Institute of Electronic Structure and Laser, FORTH

  • Salvatore Costanzo

    Institute of Electronic Structure and Laser, FORTH

  • Youncheol Jeong

    Division of Advanced Materials Science and Department of Chemistry, Pohang University of Science and Technology

  • Junyoung Ahn

    Division of Advanced Materials Science and Department of Chemistry, Pohang University of Science and Technology

  • Taihyun Chang

    Division of Advanced Materials Science and Department of Chemistry, Pohang University of Science and Technology

  • Dimitris Vlassopoulos

    Institute of Electronic Structure and Laser, FORTH, F.O.R.T.H.

  • Jonathan Halverson

    Princeton Institute for Computational Science and Engineering, Princeton University

  • Kurt Kremer

    Max Planck Institute for Polymer Research Mainz, Max Planck Institute for Polymer Research

  • Ting Ge

    Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of South Carolina

  • Gary Grest

    Sandia National Laboratories, Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM, United States,87123, Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM

  • Watee Srinin

    Physics Department, Naresuan University

  • Alexander Y Grosberg

    Department of Physics and Center for Soft Matter Research, New York University