Planck Calculation of both Proton and Electron Mass Understanding Relationship as (r_e/a₀)^3/4, also (α²)^3/4, ‘Mass’ Scaling Method of 1,602:1 further Applied with the Pauli-Hemisphere Pair Physical Model Generating Settling at 8/7+Anamolous Moment, s

I examine the ‘mass’ concept as the relative excess direct nucleostatic (“N-S”) (strong nuclear) field applied to electron-nucleus-electron interactions a) as (r_e/a₀)^3/4, 1,604.2; b) plus the physical logic of that Pauli-hemisphere using which scales times 8/7, so 1,836:

Using candidate method relative to the particle edge (r_e) and the Bohr radius (a₀) for electron-nucleon interactions by that extra dimension reduction. Yet, N-S field at 1/d⁴, E-S at 1/d³. That causes (a₀/r_e)^3/4 as the pseudo-E-S field strength constant 1604.2 for the N-S field at a₀. That generally makes N-S operate as-if electrostatic so matrix algebra work.

I examine the implications of a physical model of Pauli pairs as positions at 180-degrees to generate the net settling scaling factor of Pauli pairs at distance 8/7 vs lone Hydrogen at a0. The force level is N-S at 1/d³, versus E-S at 1/d². So, Pauli-electrons pairs has a cubed adjustment for the missing N-S force of the Pauli pair (current 1/r) at 2r. 2³/(2³-1³)=8/7.

So, mass is Net-2-Field a) with relative, static counter force; b) math as-if 2^nd N-S is E-S, c) with stability at 1,836:1 electron vs proton for Pauli pairs. d) That counter force I postulate as strong nuclear force.