APS Logo

Comparison of Classical Molecular Dynamics and <i>Ab initio</i> Molecular Dynamics with Different Equilibration Methods for Modeling Solvent - Lithium Salt Systems in Lithium Air Batteries

ORAL

Abstract

Lithium-air batteries are an active area of research because of their potential to have a much higher energy density than traditional lithium-ion batteries. However, they are not yet commercially viable due to poor efficiency, high charging voltages, and low cycle lifetimes. In Li-air batteries, O2 reduction starts when superoxide forms in solvent and reacts with Li+ to form lithium superoxide (LiO2). Solid Li2O2 then forms as the final discharge product on the cathode. Recent experimental work suggests that the choice of solvent and the presence of lithium salts in the system may have a large impact on how the discharge product forms at the cathode. We therefore modeled the clustering of lithium salt molecules in solvent without LiO2 present with explicit solvent calculations using both classical and ab initio molecular dynamics simulations. For each ab initio simulation, we also used one of two equilibration procedures: (1) performing a classical molecular dynamics simulation or (2) performing shorter ab initio simulations at higher temperatures. A comparison of these computational approaches for properties such as coordination numbers will be presented.

Presenters

  • Emily Crabb

    Massachusetts Institute of Technology MIT

Authors

  • Emily Crabb

    Massachusetts Institute of Technology MIT

  • Arthur France-Lanord

    Massachusetts Institute of Technology MIT, Materials Science And Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology MIT

  • Graham Michael Leverick

    Massachusetts Institute of Technology MIT

  • Ryan Stephens

    Shell International Exploration & Production Inc.

  • Yang Shao-Horn

    Massachusetts Institute of Technology MIT

  • Jeffrey C Grossman

    Massachusetts Institute of Technology MIT, Materials Science And Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology MIT