Our experiments show that in $^4$He crystals, the binding of $^3$He impurities to dislocations does not necessarily imply their pinning. In these crystals, there are two different regimes in the motion of dislocations with impurities bound to them. At low driving strain $\varepsilon$ and frequency $\omega$, where the dislocation speed is less than a critical value (45 $\mu$m/s), dislocations and impurities apparently move together. Impurities really pin the dislocations only at higher values of $\varepsilon \omega$. The critical speed separating the two regimes is two orders of magnitude smaller than the speed of free $^3$He impurities in the bulk crystal lattice. We obtained this result by studying the dissipation of dislocation motion as a function of the frequency and amplitude of a driving strain applied to a crystal at low temperature. Our results resolve an apparent contradiction between experiments that showed a frequency-dependent transition temperature from a soft to a stiff state, and other experiments or models where this temperature was assumed to be independent of frequency. The impurity pinning mechanism for dislocations appears to be more complicated than previously assumed.
–
Authors
John Beamish
Physics Department, University of Alberta, Edmonton (Canada), University of Alberta, Univ of Alberta, Dept of Physics, University of Alberta, Edmonton (Canada)
Ariel Haziot
Ecole Normale Superieure
Andrew Fefferman
CNRS et LPS de l'ENS, Paris (France), Laboratoire de Physique Statistique de l'ENS, Ecole Normale Superieure, CNRS and LPS-ENS, Paris (France)
Fabien Souris
CNRS et LPS de l'ENS, Paris (France), Laboratoire de Physique Statistique de l'ENS, Ecole Normale Superieure, CNRS and LPS-ENS, Paris (France)
Sebastien Balibar
CNRS et LPS de l'ENS, Paris (France), Laboratoire de Physique Statistique de l'ENS, Ecole Normale Superieure, CNRS and LPS-ENS, Paris (France)