APS Logo

Measurements of Reaction Cross Sections for <sup>12</sup>C, <sup>20</sup>Ne and <sup>27</sup>Al on heavy-mass targets

ORAL

Abstract

The reaction cross section (σR) for the atomic nucleus is closely related to the nuclear radius. The method to deduce nuclear radii from the measured σR is based on the Glauber model. The applicability of this method for light-mass nuclei (Z ≤20, A<50, such as 27Al) has been well established with many precise σR data and the Glauber-type calculation in the energy range of 30~400 MeV/nucleon[1]. On the other hand, the applicability to medium- or heavy-mass nuclei has not yet been examined based on the experimental data. The theoretical study predicts the non-negligible contribution of the electromagnetic dissociation (EMD) (e.g. 6% of σR for the Pb + C system)[2]. In this study, we performed σR measurements for the medium and heavy mass regions where there is a lack of data. The σR for 12C, 20Ne, and 27Al on Fe and Pb targets were measured at the beam energies from 70 to 350 MeV/nucleon at the HIMAC (Heavy Ion Medical Accelerator in Chiba) facility. The obtained data were compared to the Glauber-type calculation, allowing us to evaluate the contribution of the EMD effect.

In the presentation, we will report the detailed results of our experiments and discuss the applicability of the Glauber-type calculation to heavier-mass nuclei considering the EMD effect.

References

[1] M. Takechi et al., Phys. Rev. C 79 (2009) 061601.

[2] W. Horiuchi et al., Phys. Rev. C 93 (2016) 044611.

Presenters

  • Norihide Noguchi

    Niigata University, Niigata Univ.

Authors

  • Norihide Noguchi

    Niigata University, Niigata Univ.

  • Maya Takechi

    Niigata University, Department of Physics, Niigata University, Niigata Univ.

  • Takashi Ohtsubo

    Niigata University, Deparment of Physics, Niigata University, Niigata Univ.

  • Mitsunori Fukuda

    Osaka University, Osaka Univ.

  • Masaomi Tanaka

    Kyusyu University, Kyushu University, RIKEN Nishina Center / Kyushu University, Kyushu Univ.

  • Daiki Nishimura

    Tokyo City University, Tokyo city University, Tokyo City Univ.

  • Mototsugu Mihara

    Osaka University, Osaka Univ.

  • Takeshi Suzuki

    SAITAMA University

  • Takayuki Yamaguchi

    Saitama University, Saitama Univ.

  • Junsei Chiba

    Tokyo University of Science

  • Tetsuaki Moriguchi

    University of Tsukuba

  • Takuji Izumikawa

    Niigata University, Institute for Research Promotion, Niigata University, CCRF

  • Shinji Sato

    QST, QST-HIMAC

  • Shigekazu Fukuda

    QST, QST-HIMAC

  • Atsushi Kitagawa

    QST, QST-HIMAC

  • Ayaka Ikeda

    Niigata University

  • Hiroyuki Oikawa

    Tokyo University of Science

  • Kosuke Ohnishi

    Osaka University

  • Miki Katayama

    Niigata University

  • Ikuma Kato

    Saitama University

  • Yuki Kanke

    Tokyo University of Science

  • Naoto Kanda

    Niigata University

  • Yukiya Kobayashi

    Niigata University, Niigata Univ.

  • Sora Sugawara

    Tokyo City University, Tokyo City Univ.

  • Takanobu Sugihara

    Osaka University

  • Kazuya Takatsu

    Niigata University, Niigata Univ.

  • Hiroyuki Takahashi

    Tokyo City University, Tokyo City Univ.

  • Gen Takayama

    Osaka University

  • Natsuki Tadano

    Saitama University

  • Ryo Taguchi

    Osaka University, Osaka Univ.

  • Yutaro Tanaka

    Osaka University

  • Yuki Tazawa

    Niigata University, Niigata Univ.

  • Kazuya Chikaato

    Niigata University

  • Hang Du

    Osaka University

  • Junya Nagumo

    Tokyo University of Science

  • Kenji Nishizuka

    Niigata University

  • Miki Fukutome

    Osaka University, Osaka Univ.

  • Akira Honma

    Niigata University

  • Masahiro Machida

    Tokyo University of Science

  • Eri Miyata

    Department of Physics, Niigata University, Niigata University

  • Asahi Yano

    University of Tsukuba, Univ. of Tsukuba

  • Shintaro Yamaoka

    Osaka University

  • Kiyoshi Wakayama

    Saitama University