Singlet p-wave elastic electron-positronium scattering
POSTER
Abstract
The photodetachment of Ps- has been observed [1].
An elaborate calculation of the photodetachment cross section has been
performed using variationally determined wave functions for the 1S bound state wave and
for the 1P continuum [2].
Surprisingly, there exists a discrepancy between the photodetachment cross section using these
variational wave functions and the results
from recent theoretical calculations in which the close-coupling [3] and hyperspherical
close coupling [4] methods have been employed for the 1P continuum state.
Due to this discrepancy we have increased the number of Hylleraas terms in both the
bound-state wave function and in the 1P electron-positronium scattering wave function (at certain energies) from the number of terms that were used
in the previously variationally determined wave functions [2].
We obtained a better converged binding energy and singlet p-wave phase shifts for very low energies and for an energy just below
the Ps(n=2) threshold than was previously obtained [2].
We plan to show a comparison of the binding energy and the 1P phase shifts that we obtain
with results from other theoretical calculations.
[1] K. Michishio, T. Tachibana, H. Terabe, A. Igarashi, K. Wada, T. Kuga, A. Yagishita, T. Hyodo, and Y. Nagashima,
Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 153401 (2011).
[2] S. J. Ward, J. W. Humberston and M. R. C. McDowell, J. Phys. B 30, 127 (1987).
[3] A. Igarashi, S. Nakazaki, and A. Ohsaki, Phys. Rev. A 61, 032710 (2000).
[4] A. Igarashi, I. Shimamura and N. Toshima, New J. Phys. 2, 17 (2000).
An elaborate calculation of the photodetachment cross section has been
performed using variationally determined wave functions for the 1S bound state wave and
for the 1P continuum [2].
Surprisingly, there exists a discrepancy between the photodetachment cross section using these
variational wave functions and the results
from recent theoretical calculations in which the close-coupling [3] and hyperspherical
close coupling [4] methods have been employed for the 1P continuum state.
Due to this discrepancy we have increased the number of Hylleraas terms in both the
bound-state wave function and in the 1P electron-positronium scattering wave function (at certain energies) from the number of terms that were used
in the previously variationally determined wave functions [2].
We obtained a better converged binding energy and singlet p-wave phase shifts for very low energies and for an energy just below
the Ps(n=2) threshold than was previously obtained [2].
We plan to show a comparison of the binding energy and the 1P phase shifts that we obtain
with results from other theoretical calculations.
[1] K. Michishio, T. Tachibana, H. Terabe, A. Igarashi, K. Wada, T. Kuga, A. Yagishita, T. Hyodo, and Y. Nagashima,
Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 153401 (2011).
[2] S. J. Ward, J. W. Humberston and M. R. C. McDowell, J. Phys. B 30, 127 (1987).
[3] A. Igarashi, S. Nakazaki, and A. Ohsaki, Phys. Rev. A 61, 032710 (2000).
[4] A. Igarashi, I. Shimamura and N. Toshima, New J. Phys. 2, 17 (2000).
Presenters
-
William J Mitchell
University of North Texas
Authors
-
William J Mitchell
University of North Texas
-
Sandra J Ward Quintanilla
University of North Texas