SNR comparison experiments of DC heated LaB<sub>6</sub> rod and tungsten filament cathodes diagnosed by laser-induced fluorescence
ORAL
Abstract
Multi-dipole confined hot cathode discharges are extensively used in low temperature plasma studies to investigate sheath-presheath formation, develop plasma diagnostics and study plasma-wave interactions, etc. Typically, high-energy primary electrons in multi-dipole devices are generated by direct hot cathode discharge from very thin (d< 0.3 mm) tungsten filaments, which are readily heated via a DC current to the temperature emitted by electrons to produce plasma, but is very luminous such that the filaments themselves may become a sizable source of noise in laser induced fluorescence (LIF) measurements [1]. Recently, tungsten filaments are increasingly being replaced by less luminous alternatives, such as barium oxide and lanthanum hexaboride (LaB6) cathodes. These materials can emit electrons at temperatures close to 1000 K lower than the tungsten material, so the background light emitted will be greatly reduced, which involves an important improvement in active spectral diagnostic studies such as laser-induced fluorescence, i.e. the decrease in background black body radiation under the same discharge parameters will be conducive to the improvement of the signal-to-noise ratio of effective fluorescent signals. However, it is more difficult to heat these cathodes via a DC current, complicating their associated cathode assembly designs. In this presentation, we present a simple design to directly heat a LaB6 cathode manufactured at suitable dimensions, and performed comparison of LIF signal-to-noise ratio of this LaB6 hot cathode discharge with that of a typical tungsten filament discharge.
–
Publication: [1] Yip, C.S. and D. Jiang, Laser induced fluorescence diagnostic for velocity distribution functions:applications, physics, methods and developments. Plasma Science & Technology, 2021. 23(5).
Presenters
Di Jiang
Institute of Plasma Physics, Hefei Institutes of Physical Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hefei 230031, China, Chinese Academy of Sciences
Authors
Di Jiang
Institute of Plasma Physics, Hefei Institutes of Physical Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hefei 230031, China, Chinese Academy of Sciences
Chi-Shung Yip
Chinese Academy of Sciences
Wei Zhang
Institute of Plasma Physics, Hefei Institutes of Physical Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hefei 230031, China, Chinese Academy of Sciences
Chenyao Jin
University of Science and Technology of, Chinese Academy of Sciences; University of Science and Technology of China
Guosheng Xu
Institute of Plasma Physics, Hefei Institutes of Physical Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hefei 230031, China, Chinese Academy of Sciences