APS Logo

Observation Of Edge Magnetic Islands And 3D Turbulence Structure During Rmp ELM Suppression

ORAL · Invited

Abstract

For the first time, a "phase flip" is observed in the ion temperature signal associated with a rotating n=1 edge magnetic island induced by RMP on the KSTAR tokamak, under an optimized spectral configuration [1] that enables ELM suppression without core locking. This observed phase flip serves as direct evidence of small magnetic islands forming near the pedestal top—a key region of the plasma edge—during ELM suppression. Notably, unlike in a previous study using higher n=2 RMP [2], no subtraction of the edge kink response was required to reveal this signature. The experiments also found that the phase flip, an indicator of a magnetic island, is clear only during the ELM suppression phase but not during the ELM mitigation phase, where multiple discharges are investigated to clarify potential uncertainties. In addition, a sharp drop in pedestal carbon ion temperature was observed during the transition from ELM mitigation to complete suppression, supporting the idea that edge magnetic island penetration plays an important role in ELM suppression. The study also uncovered a unique turbulent structure associated with these edge magnetic islands. Unlike the turbulence with larger core islands due to tearing modes, the turbulence near the edge islands showed distinct asymmetry relative to the X-point. These results emphasize how turbulence dynamics at the plasma edge differ fundamentally from those in the core, potentially with its smaller size than large core islands. These results provide valuable insights into the role of edge magnetic islands in ELM suppression and self-organized turbulence structure, advancing our understanding of plasma stability and the mechanisms that govern confinement in fusion devices.

Publication: [1] S.M. Yang et al., Nat Commun 15, 1275 (2024)<br>[2] M. Willensdorfer et al., Nat. Phys. 20, 1980–1988 (2024)

Presenters

  • SeongMoo Yang

    Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory (PPPL)

Authors

  • SeongMoo Yang

    Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory (PPPL)

  • SangKyeun Kim

    Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory (PPPL)

  • Jong-Kyu Park

    Seoul National University, PPPL, Seoul National University

  • Qiming Hu

    Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory (PPPL), Princeton University

  • J. Lee

    Korea Institute of Fusion Energy (KFE), KFE

  • Jaewook Kim

    Korea Institute of Fusion Energy (KFE)

  • Seung-Hoe Ku

    Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory, Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory (PPPL)

  • Minjun J. Choi

    Korea Institute of Fusion Energy (KFE), KFE

  • Jekil Lee

    Korea Institute of Fusion Energy (KFE), Korea Institute of Fusion Energy

  • Won Ha Ko

    Korea Institute of Fusion Energy (KFE)

  • GunYoung Park

    Korea Institute of Fusion Energy

  • Gyungjin Choi

    Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology

  • T.S. Hahm

    Seoul National University

  • Nikolas C Logan

    Columbia University

  • Egemen Kolemen

    Princeton University

  • Gerrit J Kramer

    Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory (PPPL)

  • Alessandro Bortolon

    Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory (PPPL)

  • Joseph A Snipes

    Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory (PPPL)