Charge Separation Caused by Fast Ion Trajectories and Losses

POSTER

Abstract

Neutral beam injection (NBI) is ionized inside the plasma, forming fast ions and electrons. While electrons remain near the ionization flux surface, fast ions move across flux surfaces, causing charge separation and generating a radial electric field Er [1].

imilarly, charge separation arises from various fast ion losses. Electrons associated with fast ions lost to the chamber walls (wall losses) remain confined in the plasma. Charge-exchange (CX) losses, enhanced near the plasma edge by elevated neutral density, generate thermal ions on outer flux surfaces. The resulting thermal ions and the associated electrons from the original fast ion ionization are also shifted.

We evaluate the contributions of different charge separation mechanisms for various NBI directions. FIDASIM [2] simulates NBI attenuation, defining electron density, EBdyna [3] provides fast ion density and losses, DEGAS2 [4] computes 2D background neutrals for CX. Confined fast ions and CX losses generate opposing charge separation for co- and counter-NBI, with different spatial profiles. Wall losses shift positive charge outward in all cases. Charge separation from CX and wall losses peaks in the pedestal and edge plasma regions. The resulting radial electric field can contribute to the overall E×B shear in the pedestal. Since transition to QHmode is limited by E×B shear threshold [5], we evaluate the NBI induced charge separation in a DIII-D QH-mode discharge.

Publication: [1] Xingyuan Xu, Yingfeng Xu, Xiaodong Zhang, and Youjun Hu. Simulations of the radial electric field induced
by neutral beam injection in a tokamak. Nuclear Fusion, 61(8):086002, jun 2021.
[2] Benedikt Geiger, Luke Stagner, William W Heidbrink, Ralph Dux, Rainer Fischer, Yutaka Fujiwara, Alvin
Garcia, Asger Schou Jacobsen, Anton Jansen vanVuuren, Alexander N Karpushov, Deyong Liu, Philip Adrian
Schneider, Igor Sfiligoi, Peter Zsolt Poloskei, and Markus Weiland. Progress in modelling fast-ion d-alpha
spectra and neutral particle analyzer fluxes using fidasim. Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion, 2020.
[3] F. Jaulmes, G. Zadvitskiy, K. Bogar, M. Imrisek, J. Hromadka, S.Y. Cats, J. Varju, M. Komm, and R. Panek.
Modelling of charge-exchange induced nbi losses in the compass upgrade tokamak. Nuclear Fusion, 61(4):046012,
mar 2021.
[4] Daren Stotler and Charles Karney. Neutral gas transport modeling with degas 2. Contributions to Plasma
Physics, 34(2-3):392–397, 1994.
[5] TM Wilks, AM Garofalo, PH Diamond, ZB Guo, JW Hughes, KH Burrell, and Xi Chen. Scaling trends of the
critical e× b shear for edge harmonic oscillation onset in diii-d quiescent h-mode plasmas. Nuclear Fusion,
58(11):112002, 2018.

Presenters

  • Klara Bogar

    Institute of Plasma Physics of the CAS, Czech Republic

Authors

  • Klara Bogar

    Institute of Plasma Physics of the CAS, Czech Republic

  • Fabien Jaulmes

    Institute of Plasma Physics of the CAS, Czech Republic

  • William Walter Heidbrink

    University of California, Irvine

  • Xiaodi Du

    General Atomics

  • Jose Rueda Rueda

    Universidad de Sevilla/University of California-Irvine, UC Irvine

  • Deyong Liu

    General Atomics

  • Michael A Van Zeeland

    General Atomics

  • Quinn T Pratt

    Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory, Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory (PPPL)

  • Ryan Albosta

    University of Wisconsin - Madison

  • Filipp Khabanov

    University of Wisconsin, Madison, University of Wisconsin Madison, University of Wisconsin - Madison