The type-I ELM-free EDA and QCE regimes in ASDEX Upgrade - similarities and differences
ORAL
Abstract
An extensive diagnostics set-up allows to study the differences and similarities between EDA and QCE. The most striking similarities are (i) the presence of a mode at the pedestal foot, close to the separatrix and called the quasi-coherent mode (QCM) and (ii) the access conditions, favoured by high plasma shaping and sufficient fuelling. The most prominent difference are (i) the strong filamentary activity in the scrape-off layer in the QCE regime compared to their near absence in EDA and (ii) the broadened power fall-off length in QCE [Faitsch, NME, 2021].
This contribution presents the existence space of both EDA and QCE in terms of global as well as local separatrix plasma parameters, with QCE being at higher plasma pressure and higher separatrix density compared to EDA which is operated closer to the L-H power threshold. The conditions at which filaments are visible in the divertor will be discussed.
–
Presenters
-
Michael Faitsch
Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics, Max-Planck-Institut für Plasmaphysik, Boltzmannstr. 2, 85748 Garching, Germany
Authors
-
Michael Faitsch
Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics, Max-Planck-Institut für Plasmaphysik, Boltzmannstr. 2, 85748 Garching, Germany
-
Michael G Dunne
Max-Planck Institut für Plasmaphysik, Max–Planck–Institut fuer Plasmaphysik
-
Luís Gil
Instituto de Plasmas e Fusão Nuclear, Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, 1049-001 Lisboa, Portugal
-
Ondrej Grover
Max-Planck-Institute for Plasmaphysics
-
Thomas H Eich
Commonwealth Fusion Systems
-
Gustavo Grenfell
Max-Planck-Institut für Plasmaphysik, Boltzmannstr. 2, 85748 Garching, Germany
-
Michael Griener
Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics, Boltzmannstr. 2, 85748 Garching, Germany
-
Joey Kalis
Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics
-
Andreas Redl
Max-Planck-Institute for Plasmaphysics
-
Jacob Gerald Schellpfeffer
MIT PSFC