APS Logo

Impact of Ballooning-Like Cross-Field Transport on In-Out Divertor Power Asymmetries in SPARC Long-Legged Geometries

POSTER

Abstract

Several SOLPS-ITER L-mode Q>1 (fG~0.1—0.5) simulations of SPARC single-null divertor configurations yield the majority of exhaust power reaching the inner target. This effect is connected in this work to the poloidal distribution of power crossing the separatrix (q), using SOLPS-ITER "ballooning" transport coefficients to scale local perpendicular diffusivities by 〈B〉/ Bα: larger α enhance low-field-side power fluxes, and move the stagnation point towards the outer midplane. Additionally, scanning upstream collisionality (αt~0.1—1.0) in longer-legged geometries can reverse the in-out target power asymmetry, as reported in [J. Lore et al. Nucl. Fusion 2024]. Comparing simulations with and without currents enabled shows that thermoelectric currents enhance pre-existing asymmetries.

We interpret the results using a self-consistent "three-point model": inner and outer target, and a common stagnation point. The poloidal distribution of q is a significant driver of in-out asymmetries, and adjusting it yields good agreement with SOLPS-ITER, capturing the stagnation point's dependency on collisionality and geometry. For outer legs comparable to the inner leg (~5—10 m), Pin/Pout<1 is observed in SPARC-relevant regimes. For longer outer legs (~25—50 m), q profiles less peaked at the outer midplane lead to Pin/Pout>1. A more realistic implementation of ballooning-like transport may beneficially balance the in-out power asymmetries in SOLPS-ITER.

Presenters

  • Leonardo Corsaro

    Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Authors

  • Leonardo Corsaro

    Massachusetts Institute of Technology

  • Michael Robert Knox Wigram

    Massachusetts Institute of Technology

  • Rebecca L Masline

    Massachusetts Institute of Technology

  • Sean B Ballinger

    Commonwealth Fusion Systems

  • Marco Andrés Miller

    MIT Plasma Science and Fusion Center, Massachusetts Institute of Technology

  • Earl S Marmar

    Massachusetts Institute of Technology

  • Haosheng Wu

    Politecnico di Torino

  • Thomas H Eich

    Commonwealth Fusion Systems