APS Logo

An MeV X-ray source from Laser Wakefield Acceleration based betatron radiation

ORAL

Abstract

Laser-plasma based X-ray sources are of interest for High Energy Density Science applications, such as imaging an Inertial Confinement Fusion implosion to observe the role of instabilities (Rayleigh-Taylor instability, etc.). The desired X-ray source has a high spatial and temporal resolution, and a spectrum up to 100s of keV to image inside the gold hohlraum. A betatron X-ray source from Laser-Wakefield Acceleration (LWFA) has enhanced temporal resolution when compared to currently existing X-ray backlighters, because the temporal resolution is synchronized with the laser pulse, providing fs resolution when driven with a fs-scale pulse. Typically, betatron X-ray sources provide a spatial resolution of sub-10 microns, depending on the laser plasma parameters. This work will benchmark the spectral range and spatial resolution of a betatron X-ray source from plasma waveguide enhanced LWFA, which have never been measured before.

We will present results from an experiment in August 2025 at the ELBA end station at ELI Beamlines with the HAPLS laser (800 nm, 30 fs, 15 J, .2 Hz), and characterize the resulting flux, critical energy, and source size of the betatron X-rays. This will also provide greater experimental knowledge of processes undergone in the wake in this novel injection scheme such as the electron beam trajectories, which are measured through betatron X-ray source size. In previous experiments, low flux and instability from shot-to-shot were drawbacks when applying betatron X-rays to applications, compared to current methods (X-ray tubes, Synchrotron sources). By examining the impact of this novel injection mechanism on LWFA X-ray source generation, we will better understand how a careful tailoring of electron beam parameters in a LWF can dictate X-ray source parameters and therefore suitability for specific applications.

Presenters

  • Isabella M Pagano

    Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, University of Texas at Austin

Authors

  • Isabella M Pagano

    Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, University of Texas at Austin

  • Franziska S Treffert

    Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory

  • Abhik Sarkar

    Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Lawrence Livermore Natl Lab

  • Matthew Peter Selwood

    Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory

  • Matthew P. Hill

    Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory

  • Jackson G Williams

    Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory

  • Alejandro Figueroa Bengoa

    Los Alamos National Laboratory

  • Ashlyn Van Pelt

    Los Alamos National Lab

  • David Yapell

    Los Alamos National Laboratory

  • James Hunter

    Los Alamos National Lab

  • Martin Adams

    Fraunhofer Institute for Laser Technology

  • Leon Goriben

    Fraunhofer Institute for Laser Technology

  • Claudia Keibler-Willner

    Fraunhofer Institute for Laser Technology

  • Sarah Klein

    Fraunhofer Institute for Laser Technology

  • Moritz Kröger

    Frauenhofer Institue for Laser Technology

  • Jan-Niklas Schneider

    RWTH Aachen

  • Johannes Weitenberg

    Frauenhofer Institue for Laser Technology

  • Petr Mazůrek

    ELI Beamlines

  • Michal Nevrkla

    Czech Technical University in Prague; ELI ERIC, ELI Beamlines

  • Birgit Plötzeneder

    ELI Beamlines

  • Jiri Sisma

    Czech Technical University in Prague; ELI ERIC, ELI Bealines

  • Filip Vitha

    Czech Technical University in Prague; ELI ERIC, ELI Beamlines, ELI Beamlines

  • Gabriele M Grittani

    ELI ERIC; ELI Beamlines, ELI-Beamlines

  • Daniele Margarone

    ELI Beamlines

  • Chris D Armstrong

    Central laser Facility, STFC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory

  • Bo Miao

    University of Maryland College Park

  • Ela Rockafellow

    University of Maryland

  • Ari J Sloss

    University of Maryland, University of Maryland, College Park

  • Howard Michael Milchberg

    University of Maryland College Park

  • Shaun M Kerr

    Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory