Observation of Burning Plasma Dynamics in DIII-D

ORAL · Invited

Abstract

The key power balance building blocks of a burning plasma have been simulated in DIII-D using Xenon and Krypton for Tungsten(W)-like core radiation, NBI and/or ECH for α-heating power (Pα), and independently controlled plasma βN using NBI. A new algorithm was demonstrated, capable of simulating any desired fraction of Pα, using real-time measurements of Ti and density, a new fusion reactivity model that reproduces the cross-section fractional dependence on Ti at DIII-D levels, and the output to either or both NBI and ECH power. At DIII-D’s ITER Baseline discharges core Te ~ 2-3 keV, Kr and Xe radiate at equivalent rates to W at the expected ITER and FPP Te ~ 20 keV. Under these conditions, DIII-D experiments have uncovered non-linear oscillations coupling density, temperature and radiation, and reproduced them with a new coupled model that includes radiation and input power feedback consistent with the experiment. With the addition of the Pα ~ ne2Ti2 typical of fusion reactors, this non-linearity is expected to be enhanced, calling for viable control solutions. The new model reproduces the oscillations and the interplay of the Pα with the background plasma, showing an increase in the oscillations frequency and amplitude proportional to the magnitude of Pα. In the experimental application, both flattop and ramp-down phases were simulated with Pα and ITER-relevant parameters. The interplay between the W-like core radiated power, the simulated Pα, and the βN feedback shows that Pfus and equivalent Q experiences slow oscillations at fixed Paux when the response is not controlled. Equivalent values of Q ~ 5-20 were achieved with low Prad, while higher Kr radiation in nominally Q > 5 conditions becomes uncontrollable due to the sharp reduction of Ti in Pα. These experiments establish a test-bed for simulating fusion burn dynamics and testing burn control techniques needed for long pulse high fusion gain experiments in ITER and FPPs.

Presenters

  • Gerald A Navratil

    Columbia University

Authors

  • Gerald A Navratil

    Columbia University

  • Francesca Turco

    Columbia University

  • Jeremy M Hanson

    Columbia University

  • Charles Mark Greenfield

    Oak Ridge National Laboratory

  • George Sips

    General Atomics

  • A Stephane BIWOLE

    Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Boston, MA, United States of America

  • Adam G McLean

    Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory

  • Tomas Odstrcil

    General Atomics