APS Logo

Recent high-q<sub>min</sub> scenario development efforts on the DIII-D tokamak

POSTER

Abstract

Steady-state fusion pilot plant concepts are often designed around scenarios with elevated safety factor profiles. Exclusion of low order rational surfaces is thought to prevent dangerous 2/1 tearing modes and disallows sawtooth crashes. High-qmin plasmas in DIII-D can achieve safety factor values set forth in studies like CAT-DEMO1 (qmin > 2, q95 ~ 5–6.5), but have yet to reach requisite βN (~3.5–4.5). The stage 1 “Shape and Volume Rise” (SVR) divertor, which increases elongation, triangularity, and volume, was predicted to improve high-qmin plasma performance via increased confinement quality, βN limits, and pedestal pressure. However, experiments have found stronger shaping alone is insufficient to raise pedestal pressure, a key part of the predicted improvements. Two additional gyrotrons were installed concurrently with the SVR such that ~3.5 MW of electron cyclotron heating and current drive (ECH&CD) power was available. In the discharge evolution, shortly after ECCD injection, unintended internal transport barriers (ITBs) formed that were not observed in reference plasmas. These ITBs were all followed by tearing modes that locked, some of which cause full disruption, others of which unlock and minimally reduce confinement. Plasmas of the latter variety achieved, even surpassing in some cases, the flattop βN targets. Qualities of high-qmin ITBs, MHD stability, and potential methods to create stable ITBs without NTMs are explored.

[1] R.J. Buttery et al. NF 61 046028 (2021)

Publication: Planned paper for submission to Nuclear Fusion or similar

Presenters

  • Genevieve H DeGrandchamp

    Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory

Authors

  • Genevieve H DeGrandchamp

    Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory

  • Christopher T Holcomb

    Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory

  • Brian S Victor

    Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory

  • Zeyu Li

    General Atomics

  • Thomas H Osborne

    General Atomics

  • J.M. Park

    Oak Ridge National Laboratory

  • Qiming Hu

    Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory (PPPL), Princeton University

  • SeongMoo Yang

    Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory (PPPL)

  • James J Yang

    Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory (PPPL)