APS Logo

Wide-Density Pedestal Enables Simultaneous High Performance and Benign Edge in DIII-D Hybrid Scenarios

ORAL · Invited

Abstract

Recent hybrid scenario experiments with higher density (fGW ~ 0.7) and squareness (ζ ~ -0.1) showed simultaneously high performance (βN ~ 3.5, H98y2 ~ 1.3) and the mitigation of type-I edge localized modes (ELMs). A wide density pedestal width, with the separatrix electron density above 3e19 m-3, couple together the high-performance core with type-I ELM mitigation. BOUT++ simulations show that plasmas with a lower pedestal density gradient and higher scrape-off layer (SOL) density are unstable to a local resistive ballooning mode (RBM) near the plasma edge. The instability from this RBM leads to the high frequency (fELM ≥ 500 Hz) ELMs, with oscillations in the plasma stored energy of <1% with each ELM, observed in these plasmas. At higher squareness, the reduced density gradient and stronger shaping help to stabilize the unstable peeling-ballooning mode. Experimental scans of the gas fueling rate and plasma squareness show that a higher SOL density, while needed for the high-frequency ELMs, is not sufficient for the mitigation of type-I ELMs. At lower squareness, regular type-I ELMs still occur interspersed with high-frequency ELMs. These experimental results are consistent with squareness scans in BOUT++, showing improved stability of the peeling-ballooning mode at higher squareness. The wide pedestal density profile is also helpful for maintaining higher pedestal temperatures during partial divertor detachment. Using N2 puffing in the divertor private flux region, a reduction in the divertor heat flux by over an order of magnitude was achieved with pedestal temperatures of Te,ped ~ 1 keV. In the core region, the higher density (ne ~ 7e19 m-3) is helpful for improving stability to tearing modes and decreasing heat diffusivity at lower injected torque compared to past lower density (ne ~ 4e19 m-3) hybrid plasmas.

Presenters

  • Brian S Victor

    Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory

Authors

  • Brian S Victor

    Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory

  • Zeyu Li

    General Atomics

  • Huiqian Wang

    General Atomics

  • Nami Li

    Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory

  • xueqiao xu

    Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory

  • Craig C Petty

    General Atomics

  • Morgan W Shafer

    Oak Ridge National Laboratory

  • Christopher T Holcomb

    Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory

  • Robert S Wilcox

    Oak Ridge National Laboratory

  • Alessandro Bortolon

    Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory (PPPL)

  • Jie Chen

    University of California, Los Angeles

  • S. Ding

    General Atomics, General Atomics, San Diego, CA, United States of America

  • Xi Chen

    General Atomics

  • Alan Hyatt

    General Atomics

  • Thomas H Osborne

    General Atomics

  • Qiming Hu

    Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory (PPPL), Princeton University

  • Filipp Khabanov

    University of Wisconsin Madison, University of Wisconsin, Madison, University of Wisconsin - Madison

  • Renato Perillo

    University of California, San Diego

  • Charlie Lasnier

    Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory