Advancements in Disruption Event Characterization and Forecasting (DECAF) research including first real-time multi-Event disruption avoidance demonstration*

POSTER

Abstract

Physics-based disruption event characterization and forecasting (DECAF**) research continues to broaden high accuracy prediction of plasma disruptions and their physical event underpinnings across entire device databases and provide forecasts with sufficiently early warning to cue successful disruption avoidance [1]. Such success in real-time (100% accuracy in dedicated experiments exhibiting MHD-induced disruptions) with sufficiently early warning (~ 1 second on KSTAR) has motivated recent experiments that produced the first real-time demonstration of disruption avoidance by enabling multiple DECAF “Events” to control actuators using “Event feedback”. These Events now examine various physical phenomena including plasma current anomalies, vertical instability, MHD mode-locking, and impurity radiative collapses. Supporting analysis used to create the VDE Event included testing the underlying model on data from thousands of plasmas in the KSTAR, MAST-U, and NSTX full device databases resulting in predictive accuracies of 100%, 100%, and 98.6% respectively. For earlier warning in real-time, a VDE forecaster Event (VDE-f) was created based on a vertical force balance model including the applied equilibrium field, 2-D plasma current, and device eddy currents [2] and was connected to plasma shape and current profile (ECCD) actuators that independently and in combination produced disruption avoidance. The target plasmas produced high transient normalized beta up to 3.9 (record levels for KSTAR with the new tungsten divertor). Disruption avoidance was demonstrated in both upper / lower single null configurations with separatrix strike points on the carbon / tungsten divertor, respectively. The LTM-f Event actuates an n = 1 rotating field prepared to avoid mode locking. New DECAF Events are studied that correlate with plasma disruptions including a generalized capability to diagnose electron temperature collapses (TEC) that provide early disruption prediction (~ 0.7s). *Supported by U.S. DOE grants DE-SC0020415, DE-SC0021311, and DE-SC0018623. **U.S. and international patents pending.

[1] S.A. Sabbagh, et al., Phys. Plasmas 30 (2023) 032506; https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0133825

[2] M.T. Tobin, et al., Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 66 (2024) 105020

Presenters

  • Steve A Sabbagh

    Columbia U. / PPPL, Columbia University

Authors

  • Steve A Sabbagh

    Columbia U. / PPPL, Columbia University

  • Guillermo Bustos-Ramirez

    Columbia University

  • Matthew Tobin

    Columbia University

  • Juan D Riquezes

    Columbia University

  • Hankyu Lee

    Columbia University

  • Frederick Sheehan

    Columbia University

  • Veronika Zamkovska

    Columbia University

  • Joseph R Jepson

    Columbia University

  • Grant Tillinghast

    Columbia University

  • J. G. Bak

    KFE, Korea Institute of Fusion Energy

  • M.J. J. Choi

    Korea Institute of Fusion Energy (KFE), KFE

  • Hyunsun Han

    KFE, Korea Institute of Fusion Energy

  • Jayhyun Kim

    Korea Institute of Fusion Energy

  • Jinseok Ko

    Korea Institute of Fusion Energy (KFE)

  • W.H. Ko

    Korea Institute of Fusion Energy, KFE

  • Jongha Lee

    Korea Institute of Fusion Energy

  • K.D. Lee

    KFE

  • Y.H. Lee

    Korea Institute of Fusion Energy (KFE), Korea Institute of Fusion Energy

  • Yongun Nam

    KFE, Korea Institute of Fusion Energy

  • Young-Seok Park

    Korea Institute of Fusion Energy

  • S.W. Yoon

    KFE

  • Keith Erickson

    Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory, PPPL

  • Jongsoo Yoo

    Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory (PPPL), Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory

  • Ricardo Shousha

    Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory (PPPL), Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory

  • Jayson L Barr

    General Atomics

  • Christopher Ham

    Culham Science Centre

  • Sam Blackmore

    UKAEA - United Kingdom Atomic Energy Authority

  • Geof Cunningham

    UKAEA

  • James R Harrison

    United Kingdom Atomic Energy Authority

  • David Ryan

    UKAEA - United Kingdom Atomic Energy Authority

  • Andrew J Thornton

    Culham Science Centre