Advances in Multi-device Tokamak Disruption Event Characterization and Forecasting (DECAF) Research

POSTER

Abstract

Disruption event characterization and forecasting (DECAF**) research determines the relation of events leading to disruption providing event onset forecasts with high accuracy and sufficiently early warning to allow disruption avoidance [1]. Real-time application of DECAF was made on the KSTAR superconducting tokamak including initial connection to control actuators producing over 50 plasma shots with nearly equal disrupted / non-disrupted cases that were forecast with 100% accuracy. With highly successful objective prediction performance numbers established both in database analysis and real-time applications of DECAF, research advances to broaden the physics and technical events needed to produce such high accuracy for any plasma analyzed. A multi-device study conducted for plasma vertical instability produced real-time capable modelling with prediction accuracy of 98.6% - 100% over multiple devices. A DECAF VDE forecaster event has recently been produced based on a stabilization physics model to give 3 times earlier VDE warnings. High bandwidth Te profile measurements are used to reconstruct real-time capable ‘crash profiles’ to computationally identify sawteeth, ELMs, and more global MHD as NTM triggers and as direct disruption precursors. Impurity radiative collapses are examined showing that trigger Events often lead to more complex Event chains before disruption. Research also advances past feedforward control by connecting DECAF Events in feedback control for disruption avoidance.

**U.S. and international patents pending.

Publication: [1] S.A. Sabbagh, et al., Phys. Plasmas 30 (2023) 032506; https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0133825

Presenters

  • Steve A Sabbagh

    Columbia U. / PPPL, Columbia University

Authors

  • Steve A Sabbagh

    Columbia U. / PPPL, Columbia University

  • Guillermo Bustos-Ramirez

    Columbia University

  • Juan D Riquezes

    Columbia University

  • Matthew Tobin

    Columbia University

  • Veronika Zamkovska

    Columbia University

  • Joseph R Jepson

    Columbia University

  • Hankyu Lee

    Columbia University

  • Frederick Sheehan

    Columbia University

  • Grant Tillinghast

    Columbia University

  • Jun Gyo Bak

    KFE, Korea Institute of Fusion Energy

  • Minjun J. Choi

    Korea Institute of Fusion Energy, KFE

  • Hyunsun Han

    KFE, Korea Institute of Fusion Energy

  • Jayhyun Kim

    Korea Institute of Fusion Energy

  • Jinseok Ko

    Korea Institute of Fusion Energy

  • Won Ha Ko

    Korea Institute of Fusion Energy

  • Jong-Ha Lee

    KFE, Korea Institute of Fusion Energy

  • Kyu-Dong Lee

    KFE, Korea Institute of Fusion Energy

  • Youngho Lee

    Korea Institute of Fusion Energy

  • Yongun Nam

    KFE, Korea Institute of Fusion Energy

  • Young-Seok Park

    Korea Institute of Fusion Energy, KFE

  • Si-Woo Yoon

    Korea Institute of Fusion Energy

  • Keith Erickson

    PPPL, Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory

  • Jongsoo Yoo

    Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory

  • Fred Michael Levinton

    Nova Photonics

  • Matthew E Galante

    Nova Photonics Inc.

  • Christopher Ham

    Culham Science Centre

  • Sam Blackmore

    UKAEA, UKAEA - United Kingdom Atomic Energy Authority

  • Geof Cunningham

    UKAEA

  • David Ryan

    UKAEA - United Kingdom Atomic Energy Authority

  • Andrew J Thornton

    Culham Science Centre