Experimental basis in support of an alternative low plasma current path for the Q=10 goal in ITER

ORAL

Abstract

Experiments on DIII-D have achieved line-averaged density Greenwald fraction (fGr) above 1 simultaneously with H98y2 around 1.5, providing an experimental basis that addresses the need for an alternative low plasma current path to the Q=10 goal in ITER. As stated in a recent ITER report [Loarte, ITR-24-004 (2024)], ITER is seeking an alternative higher q95 (≥6) plan for its Q=10 mission. The target Ip is around 7.5 MA at BT=5.3 T. A dedicated 0-D calculation in this study shows a requirement of fGr≥1.0 and H98y2>1.2 at Ip≤12 MA while keeping βT and density constant as the original values in the 15 MA case. Further reduced Ip requires higher fGr and higher H98y2, simultaneously. There was no experimental support for such operating space due to insufficient H98y2 at fGr≥1.0, until the recent high poloidal-beta (βP) experiments on DIII-D [Ding, Nature (2024)]. A synergy between increased H98y2 and increased fGr is observed in the experiment, due to the build-up of an internal transport barrier at large radius in the temperature and density channels. Turbulence suppression at higher density gradient has been observed in both transport modeling and turbulence measurements in the experiment. This result not only supports the previous ITER integrated modeling work [Ding, 28th IAEA FEC (2021)] for Q=10 using a scenario with low plasma current (~8 MA), high βP, and fGr above 1, but also lays a physics foundation for the latest ITER experimental plan.

Presenters

  • Siye Ding

    General Atomics

Authors

  • Siye Ding

    General Atomics

  • Andrea M. Garofalo

    General Atomics

  • Huiqian Wang

    General Atomics

  • David B Weisberg

    General Atomics

  • Zeyu Li

    General Atomics

  • Zheng Yan

    University of Wisconsin - Madison, University of Wisconsin Madison

  • Xiang Jian

    Institute of Plasma Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences

  • David Eldon

    General Atomics - San Diego

  • Brian S Victor

    LLNL

  • Alessandro Marinoni

    UCSD

  • Qiming Hu

    Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory

  • Ivo S Carvalho

    ITER Organization

  • Joseph T McClenaghan

    General Atomics, General Atomics - San Diego

  • Tomas Odstrcil

    General Atomics - San Diego

  • Liang Wang

    Chinese Academy of Sciences, Institute of Plasma Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences

  • Alan Hyatt

    General Atomics

  • Tom H Osborne

    General Atomics - San Diego, General Atomics

  • Xianzu Gong

    Institute of Plasma Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences

  • Jinping Qian

    Institute of Plasma Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences

  • Juan Huang

    Institute of Plasma Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences

  • Christopher T Holcomb

    Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory

  • Jeremy M Hanson

    Columbia University