3D heat flux modelling of rotating error field correction applied to the SPARC tokamak with the HEAT code
POSTER
Abstract
The latest release of the HEAT code is utilized to calculate the heat loads
resulting from error field correction coils and 3D rotating perturbation fields
applied to the SPARC tokamak. Previously employed to simulate axisymmetric
heat flux on 3D plasma facing components (PFCs), the HEAT code can now
predict 3D heat flux in non-axisymmetric plasmas using M3D-C1 perturbed
equilibrium. This is achieved via a new HEAT module which leverages the 3D
field capabilities of MAFOT, the field line tracer in HEAT. The resulting heat
flux is assigned using the magnetic footprint and a new heat flux
layer model, which extend the Eich-profile to 3D non-axisymmetric plasmas. In
the present study, the new model is applied to the SPARC tokmak to predict
the 3D heat flux from the mid-plane error field correction coils. The comparison
with the unperturbed case shows significant changes in shape and intensity of the
heat flux profile. The utilization of a n = 1 3D field generates a secondary heat
flux peak, whose intensity depends on the toroidal location. The application of
rotating 3D error field correction as heat flux mitigation strategy is also explored
for different values of the rotation frequency.
resulting from error field correction coils and 3D rotating perturbation fields
applied to the SPARC tokamak. Previously employed to simulate axisymmetric
heat flux on 3D plasma facing components (PFCs), the HEAT code can now
predict 3D heat flux in non-axisymmetric plasmas using M3D-C1 perturbed
equilibrium. This is achieved via a new HEAT module which leverages the 3D
field capabilities of MAFOT, the field line tracer in HEAT. The resulting heat
flux is assigned using the magnetic footprint and a new heat flux
layer model, which extend the Eich-profile to 3D non-axisymmetric plasmas. In
the present study, the new model is applied to the SPARC tokmak to predict
the 3D heat flux from the mid-plane error field correction coils. The comparison
with the unperturbed case shows significant changes in shape and intensity of the
heat flux profile. The utilization of a n = 1 3D field generates a secondary heat
flux peak, whose intensity depends on the toroidal location. The application of
rotating 3D error field correction as heat flux mitigation strategy is also explored
for different values of the rotation frequency.
Presenters
-
Manuel Scotto d'Abusco
Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory, PPPL
Authors
-
Manuel Scotto d'Abusco
Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory, PPPL
-
Andreas Wingen
Oak Ridge National Lab
-
Tom Looby
Commonwealth Fusion Systems
-
Nathaniel Mandrachia Ferraro
Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory
-
Andreas Kleiner
Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory
-
Michael Churchill
Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory
-
Doménica Corona
PPPL, Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory (PPPL)
-
Stefano Munaretto
Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory (PPPL)