In-Out Power and Temperature Asymmetries in SPARC Single-Null SOLPS-ITER Modeling
POSTER
Abstract
Power and temperature asymmetries are observed in SPARC single-null (SN) divertor geometries through SOLPS-ITER simulations, showing a majority (~ 60%) of exhaust power flowing to the inner target plate, with peak heat flux densities greater by up to an order of magnitude. Maintaining fixed upstream density (fG ~ 0.13–0.22) and power (PSOL ~ 4–15 MW), the influence of divertor target geometry, leg length ratio, and SOL collisionality on the location of the stagnation point (Lin/Lout) is observed, and compared with the analytical conduction-limited scaling Pin/Pout ~ Lout/Lin. These findings suggest power exhaust challenges in SPARC and future reactor-class devices when attempting scenarios with long outer legs in SN.
To interpret the SOLPS-ITER results, a semi-analytical “three-point model” code is developed, connecting inner and outer sheaths to a common upstream stagnation point. The inclusion of flux limitation corrections in the Spitzer-Härm heat conduction model is found to play a significant role in correctly reproducing SOLPS-ITER trends, over a scan with SOL collisionalities between 25 and 1. Additionally, the importance of self-consistently accounting for thermoelectric currents in the SOL is emphasized, impacting the sheath potential and energy transmission coefficient.
To interpret the SOLPS-ITER results, a semi-analytical “three-point model” code is developed, connecting inner and outer sheaths to a common upstream stagnation point. The inclusion of flux limitation corrections in the Spitzer-Härm heat conduction model is found to play a significant role in correctly reproducing SOLPS-ITER trends, over a scan with SOL collisionalities between 25 and 1. Additionally, the importance of self-consistently accounting for thermoelectric currents in the SOL is emphasized, impacting the sheath potential and energy transmission coefficient.
Presenters
-
Leonardo Corsaro
MIT Plasma Science and Fusion Center
Authors
-
Leonardo Corsaro
MIT Plasma Science and Fusion Center
-
Michael Robert Knox Wigram
MIT Plasma Science and Fusion Center
-
Sean B Ballinger
MIT PSFC, MIT Plasma Science and Fusion Center
-
Rebecca L Masline
MIT Plasma Science and Fusion Center, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
-
Marco Andrés Miller
MIT Plasma Science and Fusion Center, MIT PSFC
-
Earl S Marmar
MIT Plasma Science and Fusion Center, Massachusetts Institute of Technology MIT
-
Haosheng Wu
Politecnico di Torino
-
Adam Q Kuang
Commonwealth Fusion Systems
-
Thomas Eich
Commonwealth Fusion Systems