Experimental investigation of SiO2 foam-filled hohlraums for inertial fusion

ORAL

Abstract

The performance of SiO2 foam-filled hohlraums is experimentally assessed as a candidate for ignition-relevant hohlraums. Such targets could potentially overcome symmetry challenges at low case-to-capsule ratio (CCR) by tamping the hohlraum wall motion, and help mitigate Laser Plasma Interactions (LPI). Building upon a promising experimental campaign at the Omega laser facility [1], a scaled-up experiment was conducted at the Laser Megajoule (LMJ) facility [2], comparing a novel foam-fill design target [3,4] with a gas-filled one. Time resolved x-ray images show successful reduction in the expansion of the hohlraum wall in the foam-filled target, while measurements from Full-Aperture Backscatter Stations (FABS) indicate backscatter levels from Stimulated Brillouin Scattering (SBS) comparable to the gas-filled target. However, Near Backscatter Imager (NBI) plates [5] show a 20 fold reduction in Stimulated Raman Scattering (SRS) in the outer cone beams for the foam target, despite both targets having the same electron number density. Such reduction could be due to the enhanced density fluctuations caused by the foam structure when ionized, which introduces an effective collision term. This effective collision term then enhances the damping rate, increases laser absorption and reduces SBS by destroying the phase matching.

Publication: [1] T.R. Boehly et al. Initial performance results of the omega laser system.
Optics Communications, 133(1):495–506, 1997.
[2] J-L. Miquel and P. Vivini. The Laser Mega-Joule : LMJ & PETAL status
and program overview. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 688:012067,
2016.
[3] M. Belyaev. Mitigating lpi and gold bubble expansion using ultra low density
foams. 50th Anomalous Absorption Conference 2022, 2022.
[4] J. Milovich. Using aerogel foams to improve performance in low- density
gas-filled hohlraum designs. 50th Anomalous Absorption Conference 2022,
2022
[5] V. Trauchessec et al., Rev. Sci. Instrum. 93, 103519 (2022)

Presenters

  • Sam Iaquinta

    University of Oxford

Authors

  • Sam Iaquinta

    University of Oxford

  • Jose Luis Milovich

    Lawrence Livermore Natl Lab, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory

  • Peter Andrew Amendt

    Lawrence Livermore Natl Lab

  • Sylvie Depierreux

    CEA, DAM, DIF, F-91297 Arpajon, France

  • Oggie S Jones

    LLNL

  • Eduard L. Dewald

    Lawrence Livermore Natl Lab

  • Mikhail A Belyaev

    Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, LLNL

  • Steven H Langer

    Lawrence Livermore Natl Lab

  • Chuck Heinbockel

    LLNL

  • Jeremy Kroll

    Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory

  • Russ Wallace

    LLNL, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory

  • Anna Murphy

    LLNL

  • Clément Chollet

    CEA-DAM-DIF, F-91297 Arpajon, France

  • Vincent Trauchessec

    CEA-DAM-DIF, F-91297 Arpajon, France

  • Bruno Villette

    CEA-DAM-DIF, F-91297 Arpajon, France

  • Véronique Prevot

    CEA-DAM-DIF, F-91297 Arpajon, France

  • Pierre Dupre

    CEA-DAM-CESTA, F-33114 Le Barp, France, CEA

  • Serge Debesset

    CEA-DAM-CESTA, F-33114 Le Barp, France

  • Alexis Casner

    CEA CESTA

  • Laurent Le-Deroff

    CEA-DAM-CESTA, F-33114 Le Barp, France, CEA

  • Stephane Laffite

    CEA-DAM-DIF, F-91297 Arpajon, France, CEA, DAM, DIF, F-91297 Arpajon, France, CEA

  • Robert Bingham

    University of Strathclyde

  • Siegfried H Glenzer

    SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory

  • Gianluca Gregori

    University of Oxford