Mitigation approaches for the unprecedented SPARC divertor fluxes

ORAL

Abstract

This work investigates divertor flux mitigation for the SPARC using fueling and neon seeding scans in steady-state and time-dependent SOLPS-ITER simulations to map the operational phase space to explore controllable detached scenarios within tungsten divertor surface limits.

The simulations focus on single-null H-mode high-power (PSOL ~ 29 MW, B = 12 T), and low-power (PSOL ~ 10 MW, B = 8 T) scenarios [1, 2], investigating a range of SOL heat flux width, , to address experimental scaling [3] and simulation predictions [4]. Unlike ITER [5], no clamping of the upstream density with fueling rate has been observed, but trends in upstream density, neon concentration, and radiated power are consistent. Without seeding, with PSOL = 10 MW and the conservative = 0.15 mm, detached conditions can be achieved at fGW > 0.6. With seeding, peak heat fluxes can be reduced to ~15 MW/m2 for the conservative at fGW = 0.3. At full power operation, the required upstream density is significantly higher to obtain a given divertor state.

In the simulations, strong hysteresis is observed in the divertor operation space at low densities across range of power, λq, fueling locations, and divertor geometries. In this hysteresis regime, target Te asymmetries and strong SOL currents affect global particle and heat flow, with one divertor significantly hotter than the other. At broader levels, the hysteresis density window is reduced. This presents challenges for heat flux control and strike point sweeping mitigation techniques.

Publication: [1] Jae-Sun Park et al 2024 Nucl. Fusion 64 076036
[2] Jeremy D. Lore, Jae-Sun Park et al., Evaluation of SPARC divertor conditions in H-mode operation using SOLPS-ITER (will be submitted to Nuclear Fusion)

Presenters

  • Jae-Sun Park

    Oak Ridge National Laboratory

Authors

  • Jae-Sun Park

    Oak Ridge National Laboratory

  • Jeremy Lore

    Oak Ridge National Laboratory

  • Matthew L Reinke

    Commonwealth Fusion Systems

  • Adam Q Kuang

    Commonwealth Fusion Systems

  • Sebastian De Pascuale

    Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge National Lab

  • Alexander J Creely

    Commonwealth Fusion Systems

  • Bartosz Lomanowski

    Oak Ridge National Laboratory