A Vision for Simulation-based, Multi-fidelity Digital Twins in Fusion Energy

ORAL

Abstract



Fusion energy is a unique field where the combination of rich multimodal diagnostics and multi-physics, multi-fidelity simulation are vital to progress. Here we present several efforts and techniques pursued towards building out faithful digital twins, based on a range of simulations covering differing physics and levels of fidelity. These digital twins can be leveraged for eventual use in downstream tasks such as design optimization, scenario planning, experiment interpretation, and control.

Work done through a multi-institution SciDAC project called StellFoundry is building up a framework for faithful digital models of stellarators, covering the self-consistent physics predictions from the fusion power core all the way to engineering calculations utilizing neutron and heat loads. Tools and schema for coupling these codes in HPC environments for multi-physics simulation capability are being developed, in addition to advanced optimization techniques and AI surrogates, to include higher-fidelity simulation in optimization loops.

Digital twins can be comprehensive or focused on targeted subsystems. In another work we create an AI model for accelerated predictions of the HEAT code, used for calculations of the divertor heat load on the upcoming SPARC tokamak. For a fixed divertor design, this model can predict CAD-level, detailed divertor heat loads, useful for engineering operation monitoring, and reduction into control algorithms.

Grounding digital models with data from the physical asset is a key requirement for digital twins, to account for gaps in physical realism of simulation models. Simulation-based inference based on AI models enables fast Bayesian inference of digital twin physics information from a combination of diagnostics, and opens a path for grounding of the models in addition to uncertainty quantification.

Presenters

  • Michael Churchill

    Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory

Authors

  • Michael Churchill

    Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory

  • Anima Anandkumar

    Caltech

  • Prasanna Balaprakash

    ORNL

  • Allen Hayne Boozer

    Columbia University

  • Jong Choi

    ORNL

  • Doménica Corona

    PPPL, Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory (PPPL)

  • Heinke G Frerichs

    University of Wisconsin - Madison, University of Wisconsin-Madison

  • Thomas M Gibbs

    NVIDIA Corporation

  • Robert Hager

    Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory

  • Scott Klasky

    Oak Ridge National Laboratory

  • Matt Landreman

    University of Maryland College Park, University of Maryland

  • Jeffrey Larson

    Argonne National Laboratory

  • Tom Looby

    Commonwealth Fusion Systems

  • Jacob Merson

    Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute

  • Albert Viktor Mollen

    Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory

  • Stefano Munaretto

    Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory (PPPL)

  • Todd Munson

    ANL

  • Xavier X Navarro Gonzalez

    University of Wisconsin-Madison, University of Wisconsin - Madison

  • Felix I Parra

    Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory

  • Elizabeth J Paul

    Columbia University

  • Paul Romano

    ANL

  • Jacob A Schwartz

    Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory

  • Mark S. Shephard

    Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute

  • Don A. Spong

    Oak Ridge National Lab, ORNL

  • Evan Toler

    ANL

  • Jai S Sachdev

    Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory (PPPL)

  • Eric D Suchyta

    Oak Ridge National Lab

  • Aaron Scheinberg

    Jubilee Development

  • Manuel Scotto d'Abusco

    Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory, PPPL

  • Cameron W Smith

    Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute

  • Nathaniel Trask

    University of Pennsylvania

  • Adelle M Wright

    University of Wisconsin - Madison