APS Logo

Heat pulse propagation measurements and experiments with equal electron- and ion-scale turbulence drive on the optimized stellarator Wendelstein 7-X

ORAL

Abstract

The advanced stellarator Wendelstein 7-X (W7-X) [1] is optimized to have reduced neoclassical transport in comparison to a classical stellarator [2], and the electron heat transport in W7-X has been measured to be significantly higher than the neoclassical level during its first high-performance operation phase with an inertially cooled island divertor [3-4]. In experiments with significant electron-scale turbulence drive, where electron-ion temperature ratios are large, the experimental electron heat transport measured in the core of W7-X is comparable to that predicted from electron temperature gradient mode driven turbulence [5]. In this contribution, experiments with comparable ion- and electron-scale turbulence drives will be presented, and the electron heat transport measured through heat pulse propagation experiments will be compared to results from nonlinear gyrokinetic calculations. In these experiments, the electron temperature gradient was controlled by varying the power deposition of heating applied at 30% and 50% of the plasma minor radius, similar to previous tokamak experiments [6-7]. In W7-X, the electron heat flux scales linearly with the temperature gradient where the ion- and electron- temperatures are similar, and the stiffness in the electron heat flux increases where the two temperatures diverge. These findings are consistent with predictions that ion-scale turbulence is dominant in W7-X when the drive for ion- and electron-scale turbulence is similar while electron-scale turbulence can be significant in W7-X otherwise [8].

Publication: [1] T. Klinger et al., Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 59 014018 (2017).<br>[2] J. Nührenberg and R. Zille, Phys. Lett. A 129 113 (1988).<br>[3] N. Pablant et al. Phys. Plasmas 25, 022508 (2018).<br>[4] A. Dinklage et al. Nature Physics 14, 855-860 (2018).<br>[5] G.M. Weir et al., Nucl. Fusion 61 056001 (2021).<br>[6] J.C. Deboo et al. Phys. Plasmas 19, 082518 (2012)<br>[7] F. Ryter et al. Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 085001 (2005).<br>[8] G.G. Plunk et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 122 035002 (2019).

Presenters

  • Gavin M Weir

    Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics

Authors

  • Gavin M Weir

    Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics

  • Pavlos Xanthopoulos

    Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics

  • J A Alcusón

    University of Córdoba, Universidad de Córdoba

  • Golo Fuchert

    Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics

  • Olaf Grulke

    Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics

  • Matthias Hirsch

    Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics, Greifswald, Germany, Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics

  • Andreas Langenberg

    Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics, Max-Planck-Institut für Plasmaphysik

  • Samuel A Lazerson

    Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics, Max-Planck-Institut für Plasmaphysik, Max-Planck-Institut fur Plasmaphysik

  • Sara V Mendes

    Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics

  • Novimir A Pablant

    Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory

  • Ekkehard Pasch

    Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics

  • Josefine H Proll

    Eindhoven Unviersity of Technology

  • Kian Rahbarnia

    Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics, Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics, 17491 Greifswald, Germany

  • Torsten Stange

    Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics

  • Henning Thomsen

    Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics

  • Yuriy Turkin

    Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics

  • Thomas Windisch

    Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics

  • Daihong Zhang

    Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics

  • Thomas Klinger

    Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics