Prediction of kinetic profiles of D-T plasma using the TGYRO transport code in the JET DTE2 discharges
POSTER
Abstract
JET DTE2 experiments have demonstrated the highest-ever fusion energy production. Prediction of transport in these discharges has been made using the TGLF and NEO models in TGYRO transport code. A new model TGLF-SAT2 [1] of the saturated 3-D fluctuation spectrum fit to a large set of non-linear CGYRO turbulence simulations was developed to address discrepancies uncovered by validation with JET deuterium discharges. The predicted kinetic profiles of D-T plasma using TGYRO have been validated by the JET DTE2 experiment and were found to be an accurate predictor when using the measured boundary values at r/a=0.85. TGYRO predicts the temperature profiles well for a wide radial window, except for a minor discrepancy in Ti in the plasma core. The electron density profiles ne are underpredicted by 20% at mid-radii for both baseline scenarios and hybrid scenarios.
An integrated modeling workflow TGYRO-STEP that iterates between the core transport with TGYRO, the pedestal pressure predicted with EPED and the MHD equilibrium computed with EFIT to find a self-consistent steady state solution is also reported. Comparing the STEP result with the fixed boundary runs shows how well the integrated modeling can predict the discharge without taking boundary conditions from the data.
This work was supported by the U.S. Department of Energy under DE-SC0019736 and DE-FG02-95ER54309.
[1] G.M. Staebler, et al., Nucl. Fusion 61 (2021) 116007
Disclaimer: This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government or any agency thereof.
An integrated modeling workflow TGYRO-STEP that iterates between the core transport with TGYRO, the pedestal pressure predicted with EPED and the MHD equilibrium computed with EFIT to find a self-consistent steady state solution is also reported. Comparing the STEP result with the fixed boundary runs shows how well the integrated modeling can predict the discharge without taking boundary conditions from the data.
This work was supported by the U.S. Department of Energy under DE-SC0019736 and DE-FG02-95ER54309.
[1] G.M. Staebler, et al., Nucl. Fusion 61 (2021) 116007
Disclaimer: This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government or any agency thereof.
Presenters
-
Nan Shi
General Atomics
Authors
-
Nan Shi
General Atomics
-
Gary M Staebler
Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, TN, USA
-
Emily A Belli
General Atomics
-
Joseph T McClenaghan
General Atomics - San Diego, General Atomics
-
Hyun-Tae Kim
United Kingdom Atomic Energy Authority, CCFE, Culham Science Centre, United Kingdom Atomic Energy Agency, UKAEA, Culham Centre for Fusion Energy, UK
-
Fulvio Auriemma
Consorzio RFX
-
Krassimir Kirov
United Kingdom Atomic Energy Authority, CCFE, Culham Science Centre