APS Logo

Designing Gradient-Density Pusher-Shell Targets for Laser-Direct-Drive Fusion

ORAL

Abstract

We have performed laser-direct-drive (LDD) fusion target designs with a high-Z gradient-density pusher shell (GDPS) through 1-D and 2-D radiation-hydrodynamic simulations. These studies show that ignition with moderate gain is feasible with these GDPS targets, even when the detrimental cross-beam energy transfer (CBET) effect is still present. Compared with the conventional DT-push-on-DT targets, the robustness of such GDPS implosions can be attributed to the following facts: (1) the high-Z pusher shell can be placed on a very high adiabat (α = 6 to 10), while the DT fuel may still be in a low-entropy state; (2) the GDPS target ignition only needs a relatively lower implosion velocity of vimp = 250 to 300 km/s, which can be ~30% lower than the minimum implosion velocity (vimp = ~370 km/s) required for conventional DT-push-on-DT targets; (3) these GDPS implosions only require a relatively smaller convergence (CRhs = ~22 and CRPS = ~17) to ignite; and (4) the high-Z layer serves as a heat insulator to reduce thermal conduction loss, plus the possible radiation “recycling/trapping” by the high-Z pusher. Two-dimensional DRACO simulations show that ignition with producing neutrons of 4 to ~10 MJ energy could be possible with a driven laser of 1.9 to ~2.5 MJ in a symmetric LDD configuration, even when CBET is still present. In the future, once CBET is mitigated in future facilities, these GDPS targets will have an even larger margin that could potentially result in 10- to ~20-MJ neutron yields for the same laser energy.

Publication: S. X. Hu et al., Physical Review E (submitted).

Presenters

  • Suxing Hu

    Laboratory for Laser Energetics, University of Rochester

Authors

  • Suxing Hu

    Laboratory for Laser Energetics, University of Rochester

  • Luke A Ceurvorst

    University of Rochester

  • Jonathan L Peebles

    Laboratory for Laser Energetics, University of Rochester

  • Alexander Shvydky

    Lab for Laser Energetics, Laboratory for Laser Energetics, Laboratory for Laser Energetics, University of Rochester

  • Valeri N Goncharov

    University of Rochester, Laboratory for Laser Energetics

  • Reuben Epstein

    University of Rochester

  • Katarina A Nichols

    University of Rochester

  • Rati Goshadze

    University of Rochester

  • Maitrayee Ghosh

    University of Rochester

  • Joshua Hinz

    University of Rochester, Laboratory for Laser Energetics, University of Rochester

  • Valentin V Karasiev

    LLE, Univ. of Rochester, Laboratory for Laser Energetics, University of Rochester

  • Shuai Zhang

    University of Rochester - Laboratory for Laser Energetics

  • Nathaniel R Shaffer

    Lab for Laser Energetics

  • Deyan I Mihaylov

    University of Rochester

  • John Cappelletti

    Laboratory for Laser Energetics, University of Rochester

  • David R Harding

    Laboratory for Laser Energetics, Laboratory for Laser Energetics, University of Rochester, University of Rochester, Laboratory for Laser Energetics, University of Rochester

  • Rahul C Shah

    Laboratory for Laser Energetics - Rochester

  • Timothy J Collins

    Laboratory for Laser Energetics, University of Rochester, University of Rochester, University of Rochester; LLE, Laboratory for Laser Energetics, University of Rochester Laboratory for Laser Energetics

  • Sean P Regan

    Laboratory for Laser Energetics, University of Rochester

  • Christopher Deeney

    Laboratory for Laser Energetics, Laboratory for Laser Energetics, University of Rochester, University of Rochester

  • Aofei Mao

    University of Nebraska - Lincoln

  • Peizi Li

    University of Nebraska - Lincoln

  • Yongfeng Lu

    University of Nebraska - Lincoln

  • Chikang Li

    Massachusetts Institute of Technology MIT

  • Michael Campbell

    Laboratory for Laser Energetics, MCM Consulting, University of Rochester