APS Logo

Validity of using heat pulse diffusivity as a proxy for incremental diffusivity in validation studies

ORAL

Abstract

One metric which can be compared between plasma physics models and experiments in validation work is the incremental diffusivity, χeinc(Creely et al., 2016). However, the quantity which can be experimentally measured is actually the heat pulse diffusivity, χeHP­. In past work, the effective diffusivity, χeeff, is assumed to be independent of the ion temperature gradient, ∇Ti, when proving equivalence between the incremental diffusivity, χeinc, and the heat pulse diffusivity, χeHP(Tubbing et al., 1987). However, we expect that in strongly driven ITG transport, the electron heat transport would be sensitive to ion temperature gradients. Here, we use the ASTRA power balance code (Pereverzev et al., 1991) with TGLF SAT2 (Staebler et al., 2021) to test whether the heat pulse diffusivity, χeHP, changes depending on whether or not we hold ∇Ti fixed. We explore which plasma conditions cause a discrepancy between the calculation of the heat pulse diffusivity, χeHP, and the incremental diffusivity, χeinc, suggesting that validation utilizing their comparison should be avoided in these regimes.

Presenters

  • Audrey Saltzman

    MIT PSFC, Massachusetts Institute of Technology MI

Authors

  • Audrey Saltzman

    MIT PSFC, Massachusetts Institute of Technology MI

  • Pablo Rodriguez-Fernandez

    MIT Plasma Science and Fusion Center

  • marco muraca

    MIT PSFC, Massachusetts

  • Rachel Bielajew

    Massachusetts Institute of Technology MI

  • Nathan T Howard

    MIT

  • Anne White

    Massachusetts Institute of Technology MI, Massachusetts Institute of Technology MIT, Massachusetts Institute of Technology

  • Giovanni Tardini

    Max-Planck-Institut für Plasmaphysik, Garching, Max Planck Institut fuer Plasma Physik, Max-Planck-Institut für Plasmaphysik, Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics