The impact of impurities and fast particles on STEP confinement
ORAL
Abstract
Multiple flux-tube gyrokinetic codes - GS2, CGYRO, GENE and GKW - applied to a high β~9% STEP flat top operating point reveal the presence of a dominant hybrid-KBM (coupled to a TEM) and a subdominant MTM. In these regimes, the inclusion of δB∥ is critical to recovering the dominant instability [1]. Nonlinear flux-tube gyrokinetic simulations including only thermal components of the plasma, and neglecting equilibrium flow-shear, indicate that the transport fluxes may be very large, but including equilibrium flow shear (at the level of the diamagnetic flow), reduces the heat flux considerably to a value that is more compatible with the assumed sources [2]. While this is encouraging, there is a large uncertainty on the flow shear value: to bound this more accurately, it is important to include the missing physics.
It is seen that additional stabilization of hybrid KBMs is achieved, with a corresponding reduction in turbulent fluxes, when a self-consistent equilibrium that includes the fast-alpha pressure is considered. The inclusion of kinetic impurities (He, Ar, Xe) to the main ions has a further stabilizing impact. Finally, detailed studies of multiple STEP operating points (e.g. electron cyclotron vs electron Bernstein wave heated) which include the kinetic fast-alphas are underway, and we will report on these findings at the meeting.
[1] D. Kennedy et al, submitted to Nucl. Fusion
[2] M. Giacomin et al, submitted to Nucl. Fusion
It is seen that additional stabilization of hybrid KBMs is achieved, with a corresponding reduction in turbulent fluxes, when a self-consistent equilibrium that includes the fast-alpha pressure is considered. The inclusion of kinetic impurities (He, Ar, Xe) to the main ions has a further stabilizing impact. Finally, detailed studies of multiple STEP operating points (e.g. electron cyclotron vs electron Bernstein wave heated) which include the kinetic fast-alphas are underway, and we will report on these findings at the meeting.
[1] D. Kennedy et al, submitted to Nucl. Fusion
[2] M. Giacomin et al, submitted to Nucl. Fusion
–
Presenters
-
Arkaprava Bokshi
University of York
Authors
-
Arkaprava Bokshi
University of York
-
Francis J Casson
Culham Centre for Fusion Energy, UKAEA, CCFE, Culham Science Centre
-
David Dickinson
University of York
-
Harry G Dudding
Culham Centre for Fusion Energy, UKAEA
-
Maurizio Giacomin
University of York, York Plasma Institute, Department of Physics, University of York, Heslington, York, YO10 5DD, U.K.
-
Daniel Kennedy
Culham Centre for Fusion Energy
-
Bhavin S Patel
CCFE, United Kingdom Atomic Energy Authority, Culham Centre for Fusion Energy, UKAEA
-
Colin M Roach
Culham Centre for Fusion Energy, UKAEA