APS Logo

The impact of impurities and fast particles on STEP confinement

ORAL

Abstract

Multiple flux-tube gyrokinetic codes - GS2, CGYRO, GENE and GKW - applied to a high β~9% STEP flat top operating point reveal the presence of a dominant hybrid-KBM (coupled to a TEM) and a subdominant MTM. In these regimes, the inclusion of δB is critical to recovering the dominant instability [1]. Nonlinear flux-tube gyrokinetic simulations including only thermal components of the plasma, and neglecting equilibrium flow-shear, indicate that the transport fluxes may be very large, but including equilibrium flow shear (at the level of the diamagnetic flow), reduces the heat flux considerably to a value that is more compatible with the assumed sources [2]. While this is encouraging, there is a large uncertainty on the flow shear value: to bound this more accurately, it is important to include the missing physics.

It is seen that additional stabilization of hybrid KBMs is achieved, with a corresponding reduction in turbulent fluxes, when a self-consistent equilibrium that includes the fast-alpha pressure is considered. The inclusion of kinetic impurities (He, Ar, Xe) to the main ions has a further stabilizing impact. Finally, detailed studies of multiple STEP operating points (e.g. electron cyclotron vs electron Bernstein wave heated) which include the kinetic fast-alphas are underway, and we will report on these findings at the meeting.

[1] D. Kennedy et al, submitted to Nucl. Fusion

[2] M. Giacomin et al, submitted to Nucl. Fusion

Presenters

  • Arkaprava Bokshi

    University of York

Authors

  • Arkaprava Bokshi

    University of York

  • Francis J Casson

    Culham Centre for Fusion Energy, UKAEA, CCFE, Culham Science Centre

  • David Dickinson

    University of York

  • Harry G Dudding

    Culham Centre for Fusion Energy, UKAEA

  • Maurizio Giacomin

    University of York, York Plasma Institute, Department of Physics, University of York, Heslington, York, YO10 5DD, U.K.

  • Daniel Kennedy

    Culham Centre for Fusion Energy

  • Bhavin S Patel

    CCFE, United Kingdom Atomic Energy Authority, Culham Centre for Fusion Energy, UKAEA

  • Colin M Roach

    Culham Centre for Fusion Energy, UKAEA