Noise and error analysis and optimization in particle-based kinetic plasma simulations
POSTER
Abstract
We revisit a meshfree particle model for kinetics of a 1D
electrostatic plasma, using kernel density estimation and a similar
method for the electric field E. The kernel K(x − y) represents the
macroparticle charge distribution. Two length scales enter, the width
w of K and the interparticle spacing λ. This model conserves momentum
and energy. Similarly, continuity is satisfied exactly, and the
Gauss’s law and Ampere’s law formulations are exactly equivalent. A
unified analysis is used for numerical stability and noise
properties. The force can be computed directly using the correlation
K2 = K ∗ K, and K2 is symmetric and positive definite. We discuss the
analogy in the presence of a grid. We can specify a single kernel Kp ,
related to the `kernel trick’ of machine learning. Numerical
instability can occur unless Kp is positive definite, related to a
breakdown in energy conservation. For the noise analysis, the
covariance matrix for the electric field shows a plasma dispersion
function modified by w and λ. The number of particles per cell does
not enter, and the noise is characterized by the number of particles
per kernel width, i.e. w/λ. We present the bias-variance optimization
(BVO) for the electric field, and compare it to the density BVO[1].
electrostatic plasma, using kernel density estimation and a similar
method for the electric field E. The kernel K(x − y) represents the
macroparticle charge distribution. Two length scales enter, the width
w of K and the interparticle spacing λ. This model conserves momentum
and energy. Similarly, continuity is satisfied exactly, and the
Gauss’s law and Ampere’s law formulations are exactly equivalent. A
unified analysis is used for numerical stability and noise
properties. The force can be computed directly using the correlation
K2 = K ∗ K, and K2 is symmetric and positive definite. We discuss the
analogy in the presence of a grid. We can specify a single kernel Kp ,
related to the `kernel trick’ of machine learning. Numerical
instability can occur unless Kp is positive definite, related to a
breakdown in energy conservation. For the noise analysis, the
covariance matrix for the electric field shows a plasma dispersion
function modified by w and λ. The number of particles per cell does
not enter, and the noise is characterized by the number of particles
per kernel width, i.e. w/λ. We present the bias-variance optimization
(BVO) for the electric field, and compare it to the density BVO[1].
Publication: [1]
Presenters
-
Bradley A Shadwick
University of Nebraska - Lincoln
Authors
-
John M Finn
Tibbar Plasma Technologies
-
Bradley A Shadwick
University of Nebraska - Lincoln