APS Logo

Preparing for Disruptions in the SPARC Q>1 Campaign

POSTER

Abstract

The first SPARC campaign targets Q>1 in a DT L-mode that will experience disruptions with comparable electromagnetic (EM) loads but reduced thermal loads relative to the Q~11 scenario; here preparations for these disruptions are discussed. Radiative collapses and vertical displacement events (VDEs) during flattop or ramp-down are the most likely disruption types for this campaign. Early commissioning will provide an opportunity to test mitigation actuators and prediction algorithms. Physics-based algorithms will trigger actuators to avoid and mitigate disruptions; these algorithms, as well as machine learning-based alternatives, are under development. The toroidal and poloidal distribution of a 6-valve massive gas injection (MGI) system is finalized, informed by M3D-C1 and NIMROD simulations. Co-located bolometers are optimized using 3D tomographies of simulated data. A test stand and prototype MGI valve are designed and in procurement to validate the delivery characteristics. The runaway electron mitigation coil (REMC) is predicted to prevent relativistic electron beams that could otherwise damage tungsten PFCs and will be commissioned at low plasma current. New M3D-C1 VDE simulations are in progress to inform optimal current quench mitigation and aid the development of EM load diagnostic analysis.

Presenters

  • Ryan M Sweeney

    Commonwealth Fusion Systems, CFS, MIT PSFC, Commonwealth Fusion System

Authors

  • Ryan M Sweeney

    Commonwealth Fusion Systems, CFS, MIT PSFC, Commonwealth Fusion System

  • Devon J Battaglia

    Commonwealth Fusion Systems

  • Alexander F Battey

    Columbia University

  • Stuart R Benjamin

    Massachusetts Institute of Technology

  • Thomas A Body

    Commonwealth Fusion Systems

  • John C Boguski

    Massachusetts Institute of Technology

  • Dan D Boyer

    Commonwealth Fusion Systems, Commonwealth Fusion System

  • Justin Carmichael

    Commonwealth Fusion Systems

  • Chris P Chrobak

    Commonwealth Fusion Systems

  • Cesar Clauser

    MIT, Massachusetts Institute of Technology

  • Alexander J Creely

    Commonwealth Fusion Systems

  • Nathaniel M Ferraro

    Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory

  • Darren T Garnier

    Massachusetts Institute of Technology, MIT Plasma Science and Fusion Center

  • Robert S Granetz

    Massachusetts Institute of Technology

  • Christopher J Hansen

    Columbia University, University of Washington

  • Valerie Izzo

    Fiat Lux LLC

  • Panagiotis S Kaloyannis

    Commonwealth Fusion Systems, MIT PSFC

  • Zander N Keith

    Massachusetts Institute of Technology

  • Andreas Kleiner

    Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory

  • Adam Q Kuang

    Commonwealth Fusion Systems

  • Rebecca Li

    Commonwealth Fusion Systems

  • Tom Looby

    Commonwealth Fusion Systems, CFS

  • Andrew Maris

    Massachusetts Institute of Technology

  • Heena Mutha

    Commonwealth Fusion Systems

  • Clayton E Myers

    Commonwealth Fusion Systems

  • Carlos A Paz-Soldan

    Columbia University

  • Ben Post

    Commonwealth Fusion Systems

  • Jake Rabinowitz

    Columbia University

  • Cristina Rea

    Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology MI

  • Matthew L Reinke

    Commonwealth Fusion Systems, CFS

  • Valeria Riccardo

    Commonwealth Fusion Systems

  • Alex R Saperstein

    Massachusetts Institute of Technology

  • Lucas Spangher

    Massachussets Institute of Technology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology

  • Benjamin Stein-Lubrano

    MIT PSFC

  • Alex A Tinguely

    Massachusetts Institute of Technology, MIT, MIT Plasma Science and Fusion Center

  • Gregorio Luigi Trevisan

    Massachusetts Institute of Technology

  • Allen Wang

    Massachusetts Institute of Technology

  • Yiru Xiao

    MIT

  • Jinxiang Zhu

    Massachusetts Institute of Technology MI