APS Logo

Overview of High Accuracy, Multi-device Disruption Event Characterization and Forecasting (DECAF) Research

POSTER

Abstract

Physics-based disruption event characterization and forecasting (DECAF) research [1] determines the proximity of tokamak plasma states to a critical disruption warning level providing early forecasts for disruption avoidance or to cue mitigation. Offline analysis accesses the full databases of several tokamaks (e.g. KSTAR, MAST/-U, NSTX/-U, ASDEX-U, DIII-D, ST-40) providing understanding, validation, and extrapolation of models for future devices. Fully automated analysis of large datasets is possible with results showing true positive rates over 99%. Analysis of vertical displacement events shows high prediction accuracy: true positive/negative rates of 61.7% / 38.0% - a combined true accuracy rate of 99.7%. Density limit investigations show that plasmas disrupt after crossing microinstability limits [2] before reaching the Greenwald limit. Real-time (r/t) DECAF experiments on KSTAR produced over 50 plasmas forecast with 100% accuracy in r/t, some triggering controlled plasma shutdown, disruption mitigation, or avoidance actuators. Warnings were issued well before (~1.0s) the expected disruption. R/t magnetics, Te profiles from electron cyclotron emission (ECE), 2D Te fluctuation data from ECE imaging, and velocity profile acquisition are installed, with MSE to follow.

[1] S.A. Sabbagh, et al., Phys. Plasmas 30 (2023) 032506; https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0133825

[2] M. Bernet, et al., PPCF 57 (2015) 014038; M. Giacomin, et al., PRL 128 (2022) 185003

Presenters

  • Steven A Sabbagh

    Columbia University, Columbia U., Columbia U. / PPPL

Authors

  • Steven A Sabbagh

    Columbia University, Columbia U., Columbia U. / PPPL

  • Young-Seok Park

    Columbia Univ, Columbia University

  • Juan D Riquezes

    Columbia University

  • Matthew Tobin

    Columbia U., Columbia University

  • Veronika Zamkovska

    Columbia University

  • Guillermo B Bustos-Ramirez

    Columbia University

  • Grant A Tillinghast

    Columbia U.

  • Frederick Sheehan

    Columbia U.

  • J. G. Bak

    KFE, Korea Institute of Fusion Energy

  • M. J. Choi

    Korea Institute of Fusion Energy, KFE

  • Hyunsun Han

    KFE, Korea Institute of Fusion Energy, Korean Institute of Fusion Energy

  • Jayhyun Kim

    Korea Institute of Fusion Energy, KFE, National Fusion Research Institute

  • Woong Chae Kim

    KFE, Korea Institute of Fusion Energy

  • J.S. Ko

    Korea Institute of Fusion Energy, KFE

  • Won Ha Ko

    Korea Institute of Fusion Energy, KFE, Korean Institute of Fusion Energy

  • Jongha Lee

    KFE, Korea Institute of Fusion Energy

  • Jeongwon Lee

    KFE, Korea Institute of Fusion Energy

  • Kyu-Dong Lee

    KFE, Korea Institute of Fusion Energy

  • S.W. Yoon

    Korea Institute of Fusion Energy, KFE

  • Jack Berkery

    Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory

  • Keith Erickson

    PPPL, Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory

  • Mario L Podesta

    Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory, PPPL

  • Jongsoo Yoo

    Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory

  • Fred M Levinton

    Nova Photonics, Inc., Nova Photonics Inc., Nova Photonics

  • Matthew E Galante

    Nova Photonics, Inc., Nova Photonics Inc.

  • Christopher Ham

    Culham Center for Fusion Energy, UKAEA, CCFE

  • Sam Gibson

    UKAEA, United Kingdom Atomic Energy Authority, Culham, UK

  • David Ryan

    UKAEA, United Kingdom Atomic Energy Authority, Culham, UK

  • Andrew J Thornton

    United Kingdom Atomic Energy Agency, UKAEA