APS Logo

The Effect of Wholistic Admissions Processes in Graduate Admissions

ORAL

Abstract

With progressive numbers of graduate programs moving away from using the GRE due to it’s inability to predict success in graduate school [1,2], and GPA inflation becoming more rampant [3], admissions committees have shifted away from these quantitative criteria in favor of a more encompassing review process. The University of Rochester Department of Physics and Astronomy implemented a well-defined rubric system, that allowed for contextualization of the applicant’s individual experiences, which included metrics for “success-critical skills” [4]. Furthermore, moving to such an application review policy can be one way to improve representation of historically marginalized individuals [5]. This presentation will overview one such system and the effect of implementing a wholistic graduate admission process.

Publication: [1] C. W. Miller et al., (2019) "Typical physics Ph.D. admissions criteria limit access to underrepresented groups but fail to predict doctoral completion," Science Advances 5(1).<br>[2] S. L. Petersen et al., (2018). Multi-institutional study of GRE scores as predictors of STEM PhD degree completion: GRE gets a low mark. PLoS One, 13(10), e0206570.<br>[3] A. Katsikas. "Same Performance, Better Grades." The Atlantic (2015).<br>[4] C. Kuranz, (2021). Incorporating a Holistic Process into Graduate Admission Reviews. APS DPP Meeting Abstracts (Vol. 2021, pp. BM09-003).<br>[5] Council of Graduate Schools. (2019) Holistic Review in Graduate Admissions

Presenters

  • Abigail Armstrong

    University of Rochester

Authors

  • Abigail Armstrong

    University of Rochester