APS Logo

Rotation of non-axisymmetric halo current in disrupting plasmas

ORAL ยท Invited

Abstract

Large rotating halo current (HC) generated during tokamak disruptions may damage next step fusion devices, like ITER and SPARC, if the non-axisymmetric HC rotation resonates and amplifies mechanical stresses on structures surrounding the plasma. An empirical estimate for the expected HC rotation, based on data from C-Mod, NSTX, ASDEX Upgrade, DIII-D, and JET, projected the average HC rotation in ITER will be above 20 Hz [1]. However, the scaling parameters used to define this empirical scaling were insensitive to variations of the toroidal magnetic field. In this presentation, we present a new drift-frequency-based scaling law for the rotation frequency of the asymmetric component of the HC as a function of toroidal field strength and plasma minor radius (frot โˆ 1/(Bt*a2)) [2]. This scaling law is motivated by the faster HC rotation observed in the HBT-EP tokamak, with Bt = 0.35 T, while also being consistent with observations from other tokamaks used previously. The new scaling indicates non-axisymmetric HC will rotate more slowly in ITER (10 Hz) and will rotate near 60 Hz in SPARC, similar to that previously estimated [4]. The new scaling is also important in light of models for the rotation rate [3], because it implies the mechanism for HC rotation must be ExB flow. Even within a single HBT-EP discharge, as the minor radius decreased, the HC rotation increases approximately as 1/a2 demonstrating that the rotation associated with the open field lines of the HC must be primarily poloidal but slower than the speed previously estimated [1].

[1] C.E. Myers et al 2018 Nucl. Fusion 58 016050.

[2] A.R. Saperstein et al 2022 Nucl. Fusion 62 026044.

[3] A.H. Boozer 2015 Phys. Plasmas 22, 102511.

[4] R. Sweeney et al 2020 J. Plasma Phys. 86, 865860507.

โ€“

Publication: A.R. Saperstein et al 2022 Nucl. Fusion 62 026044

Presenters

  • Alex R Saperstein

    Columbia University

Authors

  • Alex R Saperstein

    Columbia University

  • Roy A Tinguely

    Massachusetts Institute of Technology, MIT

  • Robert S Granetz

    Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Massachusetts Institute of Technology MI, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, MIT Plasma Science and Fusion Center, MIT

  • Jeffrey P Levesque

    Columbia University

  • Michael E Mauel

    Columbia University

  • Gerald A Navratil

    Columbia University