APS Logo

Disruption Event Characterization and Forecasting Research and First Real-time Application on KSTAR

ORAL

Abstract

Disruption prediction and avoidance is critical for ITER and reactor-scale tokamaks to maintain steady plasma operation and to avoid damage to device components. Physics-based disruption event characterization and forecasting (DECAF) research determines the relation of events leading to disruption and aims to provide event onset forecasts with high accuracy and early warning for disruption avoidance. Real-time application of DECAF was recently made on the KSTAR superconducting tokamak. Experiments focused on locking MHD instabilities produced 40 plasmas with nearly equal disrupted / non-disrupted cases that are forecast with 100% accuracy. These real-time forecasts triggered controlled plasma shutdown and disruption mitigation. The warnings were issued well before the expected plasma disruption time and early warning guidance given for ITER disruption mitigation. Offline analysis has access to data from several tokamaks (e.g. KSTAR, MAST, NSTX) to best understand, validate, and extrapolate models. Recent code improvements allow fully automated analysis of up to entire device databases. Such initial analysis shows very high true positive success rates over 99%. *This research is supported by the U.S. DOE under grants DE-SC0020415, DE-SC0018623, and DE-SC0021311.

Presenters

  • Steven A Sabbagh

    Columbia University, Columbia U., Columbia Uni.

Authors

  • Steven A Sabbagh

    Columbia University, Columbia U., Columbia Uni.

  • Young-Seok Park

    Columbia University, Columbia U., Columbia University, U.S.A., Columbia Uni., Columbia Univ

  • Juan D Riquezes

    Columbia University

  • John Berkery

    Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory, Columbia U., PPPL

  • Jalal Butt

    Columbia University

  • Matthew Tobin

    Columbia University, Columbia U.

  • Veronika Zamkovska

    Columbia University

  • Jun Gyo Bak

    Korea Institute of Fusion Energy, Korea institute of Fusion Energy, KFE, Korea Institute of Fusion Energy, Korea

  • M. J. Choi

    KFE, Korea Institute of Fusion Energy, Korea Institute of Fusion Energy, Korea

  • Hyunsun Han

    Korea Institute of Fusion Energy, KFE, Korea Institute of Fusion Energy, Korea

  • Jayhyun Kim

    Korea Institute of Fusion Energy, KFE

  • Woong Chae Kim

    KFE, Korea Institute of Fusion Energy, Korea, Korea Institute of Fusion Energy

  • Jinseok Ko

    Korea Institute of Fusion Energy, KFE, Korea Institute of Fusion Energy, Korea

  • Won-Ha Ko

    Korea Institute of Fusion Energy, KFE, Natl Fusion Res Inst, Korea Institute of Fusion Energy, Korea

  • Jongha Lee

    KFE, Korea Institute of Fusion Energy, Korea Institute of Fusion Energy, Korea

  • Jeongwon Lee

    Korea Institute of Fusion Energy, KFE

  • K. D Lee

    KFE, Korea Institute of Fusion Energy, Korea Institute of Fusion Energy, Korea

  • Si-Woo Yoon

    Korea Institute of Fusion Energy, KFE, Korea Institute of Fusion Energy, Korea

  • Mark D Boyer

    Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory, PPPL

  • Keith Erickson

    Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory, PPPL

  • Mario L Podesta

    Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory

  • Jongsoo Yoo

    Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory

  • Fred M Levinton

    Nova Photonics

  • Matt Galante

    Nova Photonics

  • Christopher Ham

    CCFE

  • Sam Gibson

    CCFE, UKAEA

  • Andrew Kirk

    Culham Centre for Fusion Energy, CCFE

  • Lucy Kogan

    CCFE Culham Science Centre, CCFE, UKAEA

  • David Ryan

    CCFE, UKAEA

  • Andrew J Thornton

    United Kingdom Atomic Energy Agency, CCFE

  • Andrea Piccione

    University College London

  • Yiannis Andreopoulos

    University College London