APS Logo

Overview of Disruption Event Characterization and Forecasting (DECAF) Research

POSTER

Abstract

Physics-based disruption event characterization and forecasting (DECAF) research determines the relation of events leading to plasma disruption and aims to provide early warning for disruption avoidance. Offline analysis accesses data from several tokamaks (e.g. KSTAR, MAST/-U, NSTX/-U, ASDEX-U, DIII-D) to best understand, validate, and extrapolate models and to consider the key question of event and disruption correlation vs. causality. Fully automated analysis of large datasets is possible with initial results showing true positive rates over 99%. Real-time (r/t) DECAF has started on KSTAR. Experiments produced over 50 plasmas that are forecast with 100% accuracy in r/t, some triggering controlled plasma shutdown or disruption mitigation. Warnings were issued well before (>0.5s) the expected disruption. R/t magnetics, Te profiles from electron cyclotron emission (ECE), 2D Te fluctuation data from ECE imaging, and velocity profile acquisition are installed. An r/t MSE system has been built. Research supporting DECAF is shown including resistive stability evaluation at high non-inductive current fraction and innovative counterfactual machine learning application to MHD stability limits. *This research is supported by U.S. DOE grants DE-SC0020415, DE-SC0018623, and DE-SC0021311.

Presenters

  • Steven A Sabbagh

    Columbia University, Columbia U., Columbia Uni.

Authors

  • Steven A Sabbagh

    Columbia University, Columbia U., Columbia Uni.

  • Young-Seok Park

    Columbia University, Columbia U., Columbia University, U.S.A., Columbia Uni., Columbia Univ

  • Juan D Riquezes

    Columbia University

  • John Berkery

    Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory, Columbia U., PPPL

  • Jalal Butt

    Columbia University

  • Matthew Tobin

    Columbia University, Columbia U.

  • Veronika Zamkovska

    Columbia University

  • Jun Gyo Bak

    Korea Institute of Fusion Energy, Korea institute of Fusion Energy, KFE, Korea Institute of Fusion Energy, Korea

  • M. J. Choi

    KFE, Korea Institute of Fusion Energy, Korea Institute of Fusion Energy, Korea

  • Hyunsun Han

    Korea Institute of Fusion Energy, KFE, Korea Institute of Fusion Energy, Korea

  • Jayhyun Kim

    Korea Institute of Fusion Energy, KFE

  • Woong Chae Kim

    KFE, Korea Institute of Fusion Energy, Korea, Korea Institute of Fusion Energy

  • Jinseok Ko

    Korea Institute of Fusion Energy, KFE, Korea Institute of Fusion Energy, Korea

  • Won-Ha Ko

    Korea Institute of Fusion Energy, KFE, Natl Fusion Res Inst, Korea Institute of Fusion Energy, Korea

  • Jongha Lee

    KFE, Korea Institute of Fusion Energy, Korea Institute of Fusion Energy, Korea

  • Jeongwon Lee

    Korea Institute of Fusion Energy, KFE

  • Si-Woo Yoon

    Korea Institute of Fusion Energy, KFE, Korea Institute of Fusion Energy, Korea

  • Mark D Boyer

    Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory, PPPL

  • Keith Erickson

    Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory, PPPL

  • Mario L Podesta

    Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory

  • Jongsoo Yoo

    Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory

  • Fred M Levinton

    Nova Photonics

  • Matt Galante

    Nova Photonics

  • Christopher Ham

    CCFE

  • Sam Gibson

    CCFE, UKAEA

  • Andrew Kirk

    Culham Centre for Fusion Energy, CCFE

  • Lucy Kogan

    CCFE Culham Science Centre, CCFE, UKAEA

  • David Ryan

    CCFE, UKAEA

  • Andrew J Thornton

    United Kingdom Atomic Energy Agency, CCFE

  • Andrea Piccione

    University College London

  • Yiannis Andreopoulos

    University College London