APS Logo

Exploiting the Plasma Response to Maximize Access to RMP-ELM Control in Tokamaks

ORAL

Abstract

Plasma response modeling captures the optimum applied spectrum to experimentally access RMP-ELM suppression over a wide range of operating currents in EAST, and provides a hypothesis for why an optimum in triangularity is found in DIII-D and AUG. Analysis of both RMP coupling to the edge resonant surfaces and extraction of multiple eigenmodes through singular value decomposition capture the optimal spectrum for RMP-ELM control over a wide range of operating currents in EAST. This confirms that the plasma response near the pedestal top is consistent with the observed RMP-ELM control sensitivities. The 3D plasma response provides explanation for the inability to access ELM suppression at high triangularity in DIII-D, namely that the resonant coupling is reduced at high triangularity as compared to that at low triangularity. This is validated through targeted comparisons with experiments across devices. These findings indicate that the plasma shape should be taken into consideration when designing a tokamak suitable for RMP-ELM control, and that predictive plasma response calculations can be used to maximize access to RMP-ELM control in future devices by maximizing the coupling between coils and the plasma.

Publication: [1] S. Gu, B. Wan, Y. Sun et al. (2019). A new criterion for controlling edge localized modes based on a multi-mode plasma response. Nuclear Fusion, 59(12), 126042. https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-4326/ab4566<br>[2] S. Gu, Y. Sun, C. Paz-Soldan et al. (2019). Edge localized mode suppression and plasma response using mixed toroidal harmonic resonant magnetic perturbations in DIII-D. Nuclear Fusion, 59(2). https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-4326/aaf5a3<br>[3] Y. Liu, B. C. Lyons, S. Gu et al. (2021). Influence of up-down asymmetry in plasma shape on RMP response. Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion, 63(6). https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6587/abf572

Presenters

  • Shuai Gu

    Oak Ridge Associated Universities

Authors

  • Shuai Gu

    Oak Ridge Associated Universities

  • Carlos Paz-Soldan

    Columbia University, New York City, Columbia University, Columbia

  • Yueqiang Q Liu

    General Atomics - San Diego, General Atomics

  • Youwen Sun

    Institute of Plasma Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences

  • Brendan C Lyons

    General Atomics - San Diego, General Atomics

  • David Ryan

    CCFE, Culham Science Centre, CCFE, CCFE, Culham Science Centre, Abingdon, Oxon, OX14 3DB, UK, UKAEA

  • David B Weisberg

    General Atomics - San Diego, General Atomics

  • Nils Leuthold

    Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics, Oak Ridge Associated Universities

  • Matthias Willensdorfer

    Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics, Max-Planck-Institut für Plasmaphysik

  • Wolfgang Suttrop

    Max-Planck-Institut für Plasmaphysik, 85748 Garching, Germany, Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics

  • Jong-Kyu Park

    Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory

  • Nikolas C Logan

    Lawrence Livermore Natl Lab, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, LLNL

  • Morgan W Shafer

    Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge National Lab, ORNL

  • Huihui Wang

    Institute of Plasma Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences

  • Qun Ma

    University of Science and Technology of China

  • Manni Jia

    Institute of Plasma Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences

  • Andrew Kirk

    CCFE Culham Science Centre, CCFE, Culham Science Centre, Culham Centre for Fusion Energy, CCFE, CCFE, Culham Science Centre, Abingdon, Oxon, OX14 3DB, UK, MAST