APS Logo

Tokamak Disruption Event Characterization and Forecasting Research and Expansion to Real-Time Application in KSTAR *

ORAL

Abstract

Disruption prediction and avoidance is critical for ITER and reactor-scale tokamaks to maintain steady plasma operation and to avoid device damage. Physics-based disruption event characterization and forecasting (DECAF) provides early disruption forecasts (on transport timescales) that can be used for disruption avoidance through means such as profile control. In KSTAR, significant new hardware and software for real-time data acquisition and analysis are being installed including magnetics, plasma velocity and Te profiles, 2D internal Te fluctuations, and magnetic pitch angle. Real-time data has been taken for the first four with excellent agreement with offline data. DECAF analysis results are shown for multiple tokamaks including KSTAR, MAST, NSTX, and AUG. An NTM locked mode forecaster in DECAF using a torque balance model has been developed for off-line and real-time use. A new ELM event module includes the ability to distinguish local and global MHD. Supporting research includes pre-programmed ECCD used to reduce triggerless 2/1 mode amplitudes by ~80% the triggered mode amplitudes by 30%. TRANSP predict-first analysis show plasmas at βN > 3.5 with 100% non-inductive current drive. Ideal and resistive stability analyses using kinetic equilibrium reconstructions with MSE show sensitivity to local q and low shear regions. *US DOE grants DE-SC0020415, DE-SC0018623.

Presenters

  • Steven A Sabbagh

    Columbia University, Columbia U.

Authors

  • Steven A Sabbagh

    Columbia University, Columbia U.

  • Young-Seok Park

    Columbia Univ, Columbia University, Columbia U.

  • John Berkery

    Columbia Univ, Columbia U., Columbia University

  • James Bialek

    Columbia U.

  • Yanzheng Jiang

    Columbia University, Columbia U.

  • Veronika Klevarova

    Columbia U., Columbia University

  • Juan D Riquezes

    Columbia University, Columbia U.

  • Jalal Butt

    Columbia University, Columbia U.

  • Jun-Gyo Bak

    Korea Institute of Fusion Energy, KFE, Korea Institute of Fusion Energy (KFE)

  • H. S. Hahn

    KFE, Korea Institute of Fusion Energy (KFE), Korea Institute of Fusion Energy

  • Jayhyun Kim

    Korea Institute of Fusion Energy, Korea Institute of Fusion Energy, Daejeon, Korea, KFE

  • Jinseok Ko

    Korea Institute of Fusion Energy, KFE

  • Jongha Lee

    Korea Institute of Fusion Energy, Korea Institute of Fusion Energy (KFE), KFE

  • J.W. Lee

    KFE, Korea Institute of Fusion Energy

  • K. D Lee

    KFE

  • Si-Woo Yoon

    Korea Institute of Fusion Energy, Korea Institute of Fusion Energy (KFE), KFE

  • Christopher Ham

    CCFE, UKAEA

  • Andrew Kirk

    CCFE Culham Science Centre, CCFE, Culham Science Centre, Culham Centre for Fusion Energy, CCFE, CCFE, Culham Science Centre, Abingdon, Oxon, OX14 3DB, UK, MAST

  • Lucy Kogan

    CCFE Culham Science Centre, CCFE, UKAEA

  • David Ryan

    CCFE, Culham Science Centre, CCFE, CCFE, Culham Science Centre, Abingdon, Oxon, OX14 3DB, UK, UKAEA

  • Mark D Boyer

    Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory, PPPL, Princeton Plasma Physics Lab, Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratry

  • Keith Erickson

    Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory, PPPL, Princeton Plasma Physics Lab

  • Mario L Podesta

    Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory, PPPL

  • Zhirui Wang

    Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory, PPPL

  • Fred M Levinton

    Nova Photonics

  • Matt Galante

    Nova Photonics