APS Logo

Analysis of gyrokinetic microinstabilities driving anomalous losses in DIII-D pedestal region

POSTER

Abstract

There remain multiple candidate mechanisms to account for transport across the H-mode pedestal[1], including microtearing modes (MTM), ion temperature gradient/trapped electron modes(ITG/TEM), electron temperature gradient (ETG) modes, and kinetic ballooning modes (KBM). In this study, gyrokinetic simulations are performed for DIII-D discharge 174082 using the GENE code with inputs from equilibrium profiles reconstructed from experimental data[2]. Local nonlinear simulations have shown that electron heat flux has contributions from ETG-driven transport, but not at levels required to fully satisfy power balance, even with variations to the background profiles. MTMs are identified in both linear gyrokinetic simulations and magnetic fluctuation data, providing an additional mechanism to account for electron heat transport. Neoclassical transport is investigated to account for the remaining observed energy losses in the ion channel. The MTM instabilities found in these simulations are consistent with observed magnetic fluctuations, having frequencies in the electron diamagnetic direction. Modifying the equilibrium profiles can result in MHD-like modes becoming the most unstable linear global mode, with "fingerprints" that are distinct from MTM's. We investigate magnetic field and density fluctuations for both MHD-like modes and MTMs in an effort to establish a useful "fingerprint" for distinguishing these two modes in both simulations and experiments. We investigate the structure and underlying physics of this MHD-like instability. Quasilinear models for MTM transport are also investigated across scans in collisionality, beta, and electron temperature gradient[3].

Publication: [1] M. Kotschenreuther, et al., Nucl. Fusion59(9) 2019, [2] A.O. Nelson, et al., Nucl. Fusion,60(4),2020, [3] T. Xie, et al., Physics of Plasmas27(8) 2020

Presenters

  • Michael R Halfmoon

    University of Texas at Austin

Authors

  • Michael R Halfmoon

    University of Texas at Austin

  • David R Hatch

    University of Texas at Austin, Institute for Fusion Studies, University of Texas at Austin

  • Michael T Kotschenreuther

    University of Texas at Austin

  • Swadesh M Mahajan

    University of Texas at Austin

  • Andrew O Nelson

    Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory, Princeton University

  • Egemen Kolemen

    Princeton University, Princeton University / PPPL, Princeton University/PPPL

  • Florian M. Laggner

    Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory

  • Ahmed Diallo

    Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory

  • Ehab Hassan

    Oak Ridge National Lab

  • Max Curie

    University of Texas at Austin

  • Richard J Groebner

    General Atomics - San Diego