Accelerating the rate of discovery: Toward high-repetition-rate HED science
ORAL
Abstract
Current energetic driver facilities depend on the ability to manually tune the lasers, the targets, the diagnostics settings, and more, between single shots or sets of shots through a manual feedback loop of data collection, data analysis, and optimization largely driven by experience and intuition. At 10 Hz, this paradigm is no longer sustainable as more complex data is collected more quickly than is possible to analyze manually.
Fully realizing the potential benefits of HRR facilities requires a fundamental shift in the design and execution of experiments done on them, the development of supporting technologies such as high-throughput targetry and diagnostics, and the evolution of machine learning techniques to couple traditional scientific computing with advanced data analytics. On-the-fly optimization of experiments will become ever more crucial as higher repetition rates will lead to more deliberate inter-shot variations and the improved operational range to allow exploration over larger regions of phase space.
We will present the vision and ongoing work to realize a HRR framework for rapidly delivered optimized experiments coupled to cognitive simulation to provide new insights in HED science.
–
Presenters
-
Tammy Ma
Lawrence Livermore Natl Lab, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
Authors
-
Tammy Ma
Lawrence Livermore Natl Lab, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
-
Derek Mariscal
Lawrence Livermore Natl Lab, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
-
MariAnn Albrecht
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
-
Rushil Anirudh
LLNL, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
-
Peer-Timo Bremer
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
-
Blagoje Djordjevic
Lawrence Livermore Natl Lab, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
-
Scott Feister
California State University, Channel Isl, Department of Computer Science, California State University Channel Islands, Camarillo, California 93120, USA, California State University Channel Islands
-
Thomas Galvin
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
-
Elizabeth S Grace
Georgia Institute of Technology
-
Sandrine Herriot
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
-
Sam A Jacobs
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
-
Bhavya Kailkhura
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
-
Andreas J Kemp
Lawrence Livermore Natl Lab, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
-
Reed C Hollinger
Colorado State University, Electrical and Computer Engineering Department, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80521 USA
-
Joohwan Kim
University of California, San Diego
-
Shusen Liu
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
-
Joshua Ludwig
Lawrence Livermore Natl Lab, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
-
Jorge J Rocca
Colorado State University, Electrical and Computer Engineering Department, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80521 USA
-
Graeme G Scott
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Lawrence Livermore Natl Lab
-
Raspberry A Simpson
Massachusetts Institute of Technology MI, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
-
Brian K Spears
Lawrence Livermore Natl Lab
-
Thomas Spinka
Lawrence Livermore Natl Lab, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
-
Kelly Swanson
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
-
Vincent Tang
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
-
Jayaraman J Thiagarajan
LLNL, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
-
Brian Van Essen
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
-
Shoujun Wang
Colorado State University, Electrical and Computer Engineering Department, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80521 USA
-
Scott Wilks
LLNL, Lawrence Livermore Natl Lab, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
-
Jackson J Williams
Lawrence Livermore Natl Lab, Lawrence Livermore National Lab, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
-
Ghassan Zeraouli
Colorado State University
-
Jize Zhang
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
-
Mark C Herrmann
Lawrence Livermore National Lab, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Lawrence Livermore Natl Lab
-
Constantin Haefner
Fraunhofer Institute for Laser Technology