APS Logo

The role of the target electron temperature as a key detachment parameter

ORAL · Invited

Abstract

Since its introduction 40 years ago [Mahdavi et al, 1981, PRL 47 1602], the simple analytic 2 Point Model, 2PM, has been widely used to aid understanding of divertor behavior including detachment. For each magnetic flux tube in the edge, the 2PM relates target values of Tet and net to the neu and q||u, the ‘upstream’ values at the divertor entrance or outside midplane. The utility of 2PMs for analyzing detachment is limited without some means of estimating with practically usable analytic approximations, the magnitude of the volumetric loss terms needed in the analytic modeling, i.e. loss of power, momentum and particles (volume recombination). Recently a surprising discovery has emerged from analysis of numerical edge code modeling of detachment, e.g. using SOLPS, namely the existence of strong correlations between Tet, i.e. the value right at the target, and all 3 of the (normalized) volumetric loss terms, thereby providing the missing piece needed for 2PM analysis of detachment [Stangeby, 2018, PPCF 60 044022]. For some of these terms, the strong correlations seem to be at least partially explicable in terms of known physics but for others even a rough explanation remains to be identified. Nevertheless, subsequent independent code studies have confirmed these strong correlations and recently experimental studies on JET have provided the strongest evidence to date for their physical existence [Lomanowski, 2020 APS Invited]. Recent analysis of SOLPS-ITER solutions for ITER [Stangeby, Lore, Canik, Pitts and Bonnin, tbp] show additional strong correlations between Tet and: the power flux deposited on the target; the ion flux deposited on the target; the neutral pressure at the target; the plasma density at the target. Implications for development of reduced models for detachment are discussed.

Presenters

  • Peter C Stangeby

    Univ of Toronto

Authors

  • Peter C Stangeby

    Univ of Toronto

  • Xavier Bonnin

    ITER Organization, ITER

  • John Canik

    Oak Ridge National Lab, ORNL

  • David Elder

    Univ of Toronto, University of Toronto

  • Bart Lomanowski

    Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, USA, JET

  • Jeremy D Lore

    Oak Ridge National Lab, ORNL

  • Adam G McLean

    Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Lawrence Livermore Natl Lab, LLNL

  • Jake H Nichols

    Oak Ridge National Laboratory, ORNL, Oak Ridge National Lab

  • Richard Pitts

    ITER Organization, ITER

  • Ezekial A Unterberg

    Oak Ridge National Lab, Oak Ridge National Laboratory